Skip to main content
. 2015 May 29;70(8):2389–2396. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv130

Table 2.

Infectious diagnoses and microbiological characteristics of the study cohort (n = 400)

Cefazolin (n = 38) Ceftriaxone (n = 104) Ertapenem (n = 128) Oxacillin (n = 130) P
Infection diagnosis
 abscess 6 (15.8) 16 (15.4) 33 (25.8) 32 (24.6) 0.16
 bacteraemia without endocarditis 18 (47.4) 32 (30.8) 23 (18.0) 37 (28.5) 0.03
 endocarditis 5 (13.2) 14 (13.5) 1 (0.8) 15 (11.5) 0.0001
 intra-abdominal infection 4 (10.5) 9 (8.7) 30 (23.4) 6 (4.6) <0.0001
 Lyme disease 0 (0) 13 (12.5) 0 (0) 0 (0) <0.0001
 osteomyelitis 14 (36.8) 13 (12.5) 25 (19.5) 36 (27.7) 0.004
 pneumonia 6 (15.8) 9 (8.7) 13 (10.2) 4 (3.1) 0.03
 prosthetic joint infection 4 (10.5) 9 (8.7) 3 (2.3) 23 (17.7) 0.0003
 SSTI and wound infection 2 (5.3) 4 (3.8) 14 (10.9) 22 (16.9) 0.0075
 urinary tract infection 2 (5.3) 16 (15.4) 39 (30.5) 6 (4.6) <0.0001
Microbiology
 Gram-positive 35 (92.1) 53 (51.0) 50 (39.1) 128 (98.5) <0.0001
  MSSA 33 (86.8) 5 (4.8) 12 (9.4) 121 (93.1) <0.0001
  Streptococcus 2 (5.3) 46 (44.2) 24 (18.8) 4 (3.1) <0.0001
 Gram-negative 4 (10.5) 30 (28.8) 84 (65.6) 5 (3.8) <0.0001
  ESBL 0 (0) 0 (0) 29 (22.7) 0 (0) <0.0001
  not ESBL 3 (7.9) 23 (22.1) 23 (18.0) 3 (2.3) <0.0001
  some resistance 1 (2.6) 2 (1.9) 16 (12.5) 0 (0) <0.0001
  no susceptibility 0 (0) 5 (4.8) 17 (13.3) 2 (1.5) 0.004
C. difficile infection in OPAT 1 (2.6) 0 (0) 4 (3.1) 0 (0) NA

NA, not applicable due to small sample size.