Table 3.
Latent Transition Analysis of Parent-Adult Child Relationships (Probabilities) (N = 938 Nested in 295 Families)
| Latent statusa | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harmonious | Affective | Obligatory | Behaviorally ambivalent | Discordant | |
| At least monthly face to face contact | .843 | .016 | .950 | .895 | .018 |
| At least monthly other forms of contact | 1.000 | .981 | .923 | .961 | .433 |
| Feeling close to parent | .852 | .439 | .220 | .128 | .013 |
| Having a conflict with parent | .000 | .063 | .168 | .321 | .307 |
| Instrumental support received | .535 | .079 | .183 | .328 | .017 |
| Instrumental support provided | .640 | .156 | .094 | .888 | .042 |
| Emotional support exchanged | .989 | .917 | .629 | .971 | .358 |
| Financial support received | .314 | .157 | .185 | .212 | .060 |
| Distribution latent statuses Time 1 | 20.4% | 23.5% | 26.7% | 11.4% | 18.0% |
| Distribution latent statuses Time 2 | 21.7% | 31.6% | 14.4% | 14.5% | 17.8% |
| Distribution latent statuses Time 3 | 19.2% | 34.4% | 13.6% | 17.5% | 15.3% |
| Distribution latent statuses Time 4 | 17.0% | 32.2% | 12.2% | 21.2% | 17.5% |
Note. aItem response probabilities above sample average of all time points are reported in bold.