Table 4. Model results for Red River Delta, Wave 1 (December ‘03 –February ‘04).

	GLMM			BRT
	Coefficient	p	s.e.	Relative Influence (%)	s.e.	Rank
Intercept	108.702	0.001	33.225	n/a
Urbanicity				0.91	0.04	13
Urbanicity: rural	0
Urbanicity: peri-urban	0.009	0.986	0.518
Urbanicity: urban	0.179	0.383	0.205
Land-use diversity (Gini-Simpson index)	0.959	0.338	1.000	4.26	0.04	8
Chicken density*	0.970	0.012	0.385	8.28	0.06	2
Duck-rice area density	-6.879	0.129	4.525	6.07	0.04	5
Chicken flock size diversity (Gini-Simpson Index)	2.424	0.073	1.352	10.62	0.05	1
Duck & goose flock size diversity (Gini-Simpson Index)	0.051	0.920	0.511	5.61	0.05	6
Percentage land under rice*	-1.643	0.362	1.802	5.03	0.06	7
Percentage land under aquaculture*	-0.974	0.799	3.832	6.30	0.04	3
Annual precipitation*	-32.626	0.003	11.114	6.21	0.09	4
Compound Topographical Index*	-7.193	0.355	0.119	3.36	0.04	10
Shortest distance to nearest national highway*	-0.079	0.082	0.045	1.59	0.06	12
Shortest distance to nearest provincial highway*	-0.027	0.472	0.038	0.49	0.09	14
Shortest distance to nearest town*	0.173	0.034	0.082	2.27	0.05	11
Shortest distance to nearest lake*	-0.041	0.730	0.119	3.57	0.09	9
Autoregressive term	n/a			35.43	0.04
AUC-ROC	0.802			Trg = 0.827, Eval = 0.737

* Transform of the type log₁₀(1+x) was used

s.e. = standard error, Rank = rank of relative influence excluding the rank of the autoregressive term, AUC-ROC = Area Under the Curve of the Receiver Operating Characteristic, Trg = Training, Eval = Evaluation