Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 26;145(10):2245–2252. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.216739

TABLE 3.

Association between Δln(GAA) and the outcomes of Δln(SAM), Δln(SAH), Δln(tHcys), and Δln(tCys) by treatment group in Bangladeshi adults participating in a folic acid and creatine randomized, controlled trial1

β (95% CI )
β (95% CI)
Outcome Placebo (n = 101) Cr (n = 101) P(Cr vs. placebo)2 FA (n = 130) Cr+FA (n = 102) P(Cr+Fa vs. FA)2
Δ ln(SAM)3 0.10 (−0.16, 0.36) −0.09 (−0.28, 0.11) 0.26 −0.02 (−0.21, 0.18) 0.02 (−0.14, 0.19) 0.73
Δ ln(SAH)4 0.55 (0.00, 1.10) 0.07 (−0.35, 0.49) 0.16 −0.10 (−0.54, 0.34) 0.31 (−0.03, 0.65) 0.14
Δ ln(tHcys) 0.03 (−0.17, 0.23) −0.12 (−0.28, 0.05) 0.26 −0.08 (−0.23, 0.08) 0.30 (0.17, 0.43) 0.0003
Δ ln(tCys) −0.03 (−0.14, 0.08) −0.03 (−0.13, 0.07) 0.98 0.07 (−0.02, 0.15) 0.16 (0.08, 0.24) 0.12
1

β (95% CI) is the estimated regression coefficient of Δln(GAA) from linear regression models. All models are adjusted for ln(baseline GAA) and ln(baseline outcome). Δ = ln(week 12) – ln(baseline). Cr, 3 g/d creatine group; Cr+FA, 3 g/d creatine plus 400 μg/d folic acid group; FA, 400 μg/d folic acid group; GAA, guanidinoacetate; SAH, s-adenosylhomocysteine; SAM, s-adenosylmethionine; tCys, total cysteine; tHcys, total homocysteine.

2

From Wald test for treatment group difference in covariate-adjusted regression coefficient.

3

Reduced sample size (placebo, n = 76; Cr, n = 89; FA, n = 118; Cr+FA, n = 93).

4

Reduced sample size (placebo, n = 68; Cr, n = 86; FA, n = 110; Cr+FA, n = 84).