. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.

Published in final edited form as: Sci Commun. 2015 Feb;37(1):59–88. doi: 10.1177/1075547014565908

Table 2.

Partial Correlations Among Adequacy Judgments, Numerical Preference, and Perceived Numerical Ability Controlling for Gender, Prior Beliefs, and Map Direction

	MU	LU	OU	Acc	TV	UT	NA
Legend Understanding (LU)	.525
Overall Understanding (UO)	.662	.730
Perceived accuracy (Acc)	.350	.437	.487
Trust in validity (TV)	.318	.391	.441	.698
Understand title (UT)	.296	.323	.335	.149	.182
Perceived numerical ability (NA)	.104	.136	.096	−.009^ns	.026^ns	.098
Numerical preference	.152	.170	.186	.011^ns	.046^ns	.104	.415

MU is map understanding. All correlations were significant at p < .001 (two-tailed) unless otherwise noted (ns = non-significant). Degrees of freedom ranged from 1540–1555.