Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 5;6:7846. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8846

Table 1. Cohorts included in the study.

Cohort Number of samples Duos from informative nuclear families Informative duos Duos from families with >1 child
Carlantino, Italy 630 6 (2) 29 (11) 53 (23)
French Canadians 477 106 (29) 158 (50) 218 (80)
Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy 1,236 13 (4) 72 (26) 160 (70)
Korcula, Croatia 897 0 (0) 7 (3) 34 (17)
Netherlands Twin Registry 2,729 298 (96) 398 (130) 889 (379)
ORCADES, Orkney, Scotland 2,215 48 (15) 118 (40) 252 (109)
Queensland Twin Registry (QTR370) 3,754 890 (239) 1,310 (323) 1,441 (389)
Queensland Twin Registry (QTR610) 7,364 1,283 (403) 1,337 (420) 2,898 (1202)
Queensland Twin Registry (QTRCoreExome) 4,444 234 (75) 329 (106) 781 (332)
Val Borbera, Italy 1,664 30 (9) 72 (26) 266 (123)
Vis, Croatia 960 0 (0) 11 (4) 37 (17)
Total   3,036 (910) 4,253 (1268) 7,688 (3003)
Total analysed   2,889 (866) 3,823 (1132) 6,011 (2305)

The three rightmost columns show the number of maternal meioses for which we had age data, followed by the number of families in parentheses. The total number analysed excludes the cohorts (or, for the rightmost column, family configurations within a cohort) with fewer than 20 meioses. The SNP chips used, number of SNPs and sample sizes for paternal meioses are given in Supplementary Table 1.