Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pers Individ Dif. 2015 Jun 1;79:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.010

Table 4.

Regression analyses with IGT PB slope and EF main and interaction effects predicting self-reported externalizing risks

Model E Model F
B S.E. p-value B S.E. p-value
African American 0.13 0.03 < .001 0.13 0.03 < .001
Boy 0.14 0.03 < .001 0.14 0.03 < .001
Age 0.02 0.02 .502 0.02 0.02 .415
INR 0.04 0.02 .016 0.04 0.02 .015
IGT 0.02 0.02 .413 0.01 0.02 .527
HF Interference 0.07 0.10 .458 0.09 0.10 .355
HF * IGT 0.23 0.12 .054
Intercept 0.34 0.01 < .001 0.34 0.01 < .001

Notes: INR = Income to needs ratio, IGT = Iowa Gambling Task, IFL = Bias for Infrequent Loss; HF = Hearts and Flowers executive function task