Table 3.
Ae. aegypti | Ae. albopictus | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isolate | 106 | 107 | 108 | 106 | 107 | 108 |
B1 | + | ++ | NS | NS | + | − |
B2 | + | ++ | NS | NS | NS | NS |
B3 | + | + | NS | NS | NS | NS |
B4 | NS | + | NS | NS | NS | NS |
B5 | +++ | + | NS | NS | ++ | NS |
B6 | ++ | NS | NS | NS | NS | −− |
B7 | + | NS | NS | NS | ++ | NS |
B8 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
B9 | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS |
B10 | NS | NS | NS | − | ++ | NS |
B11 | NS | NS | − | NS | NS | NS |
B12 | + | ++ | NS | NS | NS | NS |
B13 | +++ | ++ | NS | NS | ++ | NS |
B14 | ++ | +++ | NS | +++ | NS | −− |
NS, no attraction or repellency
Data were analyzed using multinomial regression
Attraction: +, P < 0.05; ++, P < 0.01; +++, P < 0.001
Repellency: −, P < 0.05; −− , P < 0.01; −−−, P < 0.001