Table 3.

Estimated effects (β)^* of the MIND diet score on the rate of change in global cognitive score and change in five cognitive domains among MAP participants over an average 4.7 years of follow-up in adjusted^* mixed models

		Global	Episodica	Semanticb	Perceptualc	Perceptuald	Workinge
		Cognition	Memory	Memory	Organization	Speed	Memory
Age-Adjusted	n**	960	949	945	932	934	957
β		0.0090	0.0079	0.0069	0.0057	0.0088	0.0049
Standard Error		(0.0023)	(0.0027)	(0.0026)	(0.0025)	(0.0024)	(0.0024)
P-Value		0.0001	0.003	0.007	0.02	0.0002	0.04
Basic†	n**	818	808	804	793	794	816
β		0.0095	0.0080	0.0105	0.0077	0.0084	0.0050
Standard Error		(0.0023)	(0.0028)	(0.0027)	(0.0025)	(0.0024)	(0.0024)
P-Value		<0.0001	0.004	0.0001	0.002	0.0003	0.04
Basic +
Cardiovascular
Conditions ±	n**	860	850	846	835	836	858
β		0.0106	0.0090	0.0113	0.0077	0.0097	0.0060
Standard Error		(0.0023)	(0.0028)	(0.0027)	(0.0025)	(0.0023)	(0.0024)
P-Value		<0.0001	0.001	<0.0001	0.002	<0.0001	0.01

^*β=beta coefficient from the model for the interaction term between MIND diet score and time

^**n=total number of participants with complete data for model

^†Basic model includes age at the first cognitive assessment, Mind diet score, sex, education, participation in cognitive activities, APOE-ε4 (any ε4 allele), smoking history (current, past, never), physical activity hours per week, total energy intake, time and interaction terms between time and each model covariate

^±Basic model plus history of stroke, myocardial infarction, diabetes, hypertension and interaction terms between each covariate and time

^aComposite score of the following 7 instruments: Immediate memory test and delayed memory test from Story A Logical Memory subset of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised; immediate word recall and delayed word recall of the CERAD Word List Recall; CERAD Word list Recognition; and immediate memory test and delayed memory test of the East Boston Story.

^bComposite score of the following 3 instruments: Verbal fluency from CERAD; 15 item version of the Boston Naming Test; and 15-item reading test

^cComposite score of the 15-item version of Judgment of Line Orientation and the 16-item version of Standard Progressive Matrice

^dComposite score of the following 4 measure: Oral version of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test; Number Comparison; and, 2 indices from a modified version of the Stroop Neuropsychological Screening test

^eComposite score of the following 3 instruments: Digit Span subtests-forward of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised; Digit Span subtests-backward of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised; and Digit Ordering