Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 3;33(28):3105–3115. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.3654

Table 3.

Univariable Cox Regression Analyses of CVD Deaths in Men Diagnosed With Testicular Nonseminoma According to Baseline Characteristics

Variable No. of Patients All CVD Deaths (n = 104)
No. of CVD Deaths HR 95% CI P
Initial treatment by time since TC diagnosis*
    < 1 year
        Surgery (no RT) 8,097 2 Ref
        Chemotherapy (no RT) 6,909 11 6.52 1.75 to 42.12 < .01
    1-4 years
        Surgery (no RT) 7,388 9 Ref
        Chemotherapy (no RT) 6,014 12 1.73 0.73 to 4.25 .21
    ≥ 5 years
        Surgery (no RT) 5,369 39 Ref
        Chemotherapy (no RT) 3,973 31 1.15 0.72 to 1.85 .55
Age at TC diagnosis, years
    < 30 8,620 23 Ref
    30-39 4,254 34 3.10 1.84 to 5.34 < .01
    40-49 1,602 23 7.68 4.27 to 13.80 < .01
    ≥ 50 530 24 28.96 16.22 to 51.82 < .01
Calendar year of diagnosis
    1980-1989 2,316 51 Ref
    1990-1999 3,350 29 0.87 0.52 to 1.46 .60
    2000-2010 9,340 24 0.87 0.46 to 1.65 .66
Extent of disease
    Localized 8,747 46 Ref
    Regional 3,521 34 1.58 1.01 to 2.46 .04
    Distant 2,601 23 2.20 1.31 to 3.59 < .01
    Unknown 137 1 0.87 0.05 to 3.97 .89
Race
    White 14,087 98 Ref
    Nonwhite 919 6 1.16 0.45 to 2.43 .73
County education level
    Education 1 (low) 3,310 30 Ref
    Education 2 (medium) 6,575 53 1.00 0.65 to 1.59 .99
    Education 3 (high) 5,120 21 0.83 0.46 to 1.45 .51
    Unknown 1 0 0 NA to 68.05 .99
Marital status
    Never married 8,350 37 Ref
    Married 5,481 54 1.92 1.27 to 2.93 < .01
    Separated/divorced/widowed 670 9 3.35 1.52 to 6.64 < .01
    Unmarried/domestic partner/unknown 505 4 2.37 0.71 to 5.91 .10

Abbreviations: CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; NA, not applicable; Ref, reference; RT, radiotherapy; TC, testicular cancer.

*

The number of person-years (PY) is as follows: < 1 year (surgery: 81,227 PY; chemotherapy: 60,065 PY); 1 to 4 years (surgery: 80,946 PY; chemotherapy: 59,655 PY); and ≥ 5 years (surgery: 75,054 PY; chemotherapy: 54,070 PY).

HR with P < .05.

County education level was categorized based on tertiles of distribution, as follows: education 1 represents the lowest level (composed of counties with ≥ 25% of men without a high school education); education 2 represents the medium level (counties with 15% to < 25% of men without a high school education); and education 3 represents the highest level (counties with < 15% of men without a high school education).