Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 25.
Published in final edited form as: Aphasiology. 2015 Apr 27;29(10):1164–1188. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1035225

Table 4.

Phonological facilitation effects in noun naming for each participant group (with standard errors)

Naming Accuracies (%) Naming Latencies (ms) Viewing Times (ms)
Participants Related Unrelated p-value Related Unrelated p-value Related Unrelated p-value
Young 96(1.1) 97 (0.8) n.s. 751(35) 791 (36) ** 403 (34) 435 (37) *
Age-matched 96 (1.2) 96 (1.0) n.s 788(34) 817 (33) ** 364(15) 399 (18) *
Agrammatic 80 (3.7) 80 (2.2) n.s. 2157 (206) 2235 (172) n.s. 1414 (115) 1481 (101) n.s.
Anomic 74 (3.9) 77 (4.2) n.s. 1415 (108) 1611 (141) * 663 (58) 798 (65) **
*

p < .05,

**

p < .01