Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 25;10(9):e0138073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138073

Table 5. Analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for head splitting resistance in a cabbage doubled haploid population using multiple-QTL mapping (MQM) and inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) approaches.

Year QTL names a Linkage group Position (cM) LOD Marker interval R 2 (%) b Add c
2011 (MQM) Hsr 4.2 C4 80.0 5.46 SF12597a-SF11933 11.8 9.46
Hsr 7.1 C7 37.2 3.42 SF46873-SF6178 7.7 -6.78
Hsr 7.2 C7 68.0 3.74 Indel112-Indel113 8.5 -7.84
Hsr 9.2 C9 63.2 5.62 SF13994-Indel146 13.6 10.94
2012 (MQM) Hsr 4.1 C4 23.0 3.86 SF13319-Indel58 8.6 8.25
Hsr4.2 C4 81.4 5.61 SF12597a-SF11933 12.8 10.78
Hsr 9.2 C7 63.2 5.48 SF13994-Indel146 11.1 -10.02
Hsr 9.3 C9 112.8 3.66 BoE344-BoE975 7.44 -6.92
2011 (ICIM) Hsr 3.1 C3 112.0 3.36 Indel117-SF31711 5.50 -6.78
Hsr 3.2 C3 143.0 7.31 Indel42-SF10471 16.93 11.76
Hsr 4.1 C4 23.0 6.16 SF13319-Indel58 12.56 10.18
Hsr 4.2 C4 80.0 6.96 SF12597a-SF11933 12.86 10.37
Hsr 9.2 C9 63.0 5.74 SF13994-Indel146 11.26 9.76
2012 (ICIM) Hsr3.2 C3 143.0 7.86 Indel42-SF10471 15.36 11.76
Hsr4.2 C4 80.0 6.93 SF12597a-SF11933 11.1 9.15
Hsr 9.1 C9 34.0 4.62 SF36132-SF146827 9.2 -9.08
Hsr 9.2 C9 63.0 5.93 SF13994-Indel146 11.82 10.38
Hsr 9.3 C9 111.0 3.44 BoE344-BoE975 8.67 -8.20

a QTLs are named according to the trait (i.e., Hsr, head splitting resistance) followed by the chromosome number and position.

b Proportion of the phenotypic variation explained by each QTL.

c Additive effect: positive and negative values indicate that parental lines 96–100 and 79–156 respectively bear the head splitting resistance-enhancing allele.