Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurocase. 2015 Mar 25;22(1):22–29. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2015.1024137

Table 2.

Differences Between Participants with and without Disruptions of the Sagittal Striatum

Variable Participants with Sagittal Striatum Lesions Participants without Sagittal Striatum Lesions t p-value
Age 53.9 years 54.9 years −24.0 0.813
Education 14.4 years 14.1 years .324 0.751
Attitudinal Prosody % Correct 57.1% correct 67.4% correct −2.38 0.035*
Sincere % Correct 84.2% correct 84.4% correct −.032 0.976
Sarcastic % Correct 21.7% correct 50.3% correct −2.81 0.021*
Empathy % Correct 68.4% correct 77.7% correct −1.25 0.252
Total Prosody Comprehension % Correct 51.5% correct 50.1% correct .188 0.854
*

significant at an alpha level of p <0.05