Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 24.
Published in final edited form as: Cell. 2015 Sep 24;163(1):39–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.068

Table 3.

Future challenges and possible solutions for mouse preclinical cancer trials

Issue Challenges Possible Solutions
Model improvement More precise spatial and temporal control of genetic alterations in mouse tissues Improve technologies for genomic editing (e.g., CRISPR) and regulating gene activity
Human relevance of stroma, immune system and therapeutic targets in mouse cancer models “Humanize” genes via genetic engineering and immune system by reconstitution with human hematopoietic stem cells
Recapitulation of the tumor heterogeneity found in human cancers Introduce environmental etiological factors (e.g., UV in skin cancer models); allow tumor evolution by avoiding inappropriately dominant oncogenic drivers
Study setting Difficulties in diagnosis and treatment of large cohorts of mice as individual patients Synchronize tumorigenesis by adopting inducible GEM or transplantable GDA systems
Disease progression and clinically relevant endpoints in preclinical study Improve biomarkers and imaging techniques for tumor tracking; adopt clinically-relevant endpoints (e.g., progression-free survival)
Integration of pathologic, genomic, bioinformatic, molecular and immunological analyses Develop/share improved and standardized protocols; organize workflows with core facilities
Extrapolation to human disease Evaluating effects of life style on therapeutic outcomes Consider gender, diet, and exposure to environmental factors in protocol development; consider effects of microbiota
Physiological difference between mouse and human “Humanize” aspects of mice; consider scaling law in PD/PK, life span, hemodynamics, etc.