Table 2.

Self-Reported Active Transportation and Non-transportation Physical Activity, Perceived Barriers to Active Transportation, and Perceived and Objective Neighborhood Walkability in Adult CCS and Neighborhood Controls

	CCS (N=158)		Controls (N=153)
	Mean ± SEa	N (%)	Mean ± SEa	N (%)	Pa
Active Transportation (hours/week)	2.72 ± 0.49		2.32 ± 0.50		0.40
No Active Transportation		56 (35.4)		53 (34.6)	0.39
Some Active Transportation		98 (62.0)		98 (64.1)
Missing		4 (2.5)		2 (1.3)
Non-transportation PA (hours/week)	18.2 ± 1.6		17.2 ± 1.7		0.52
Barriers to Active Transportationb
Environment	2.04 ± 0.07		2.07 ± 0.07		0.70
Planning/Psychosocial	1.96 ± 0.07		2.02 ± 0.06		0.42
Safety	1.41 ± 0.06		1.41 ± 0.07		0.90
Health	1.88 ± 0.08		1.65 ± 0.07		0.01
Neighborhood Walkability
Perceivedc	2.13 ± 0.10		2.24 ± 0.11		0.21
Objective (Walk Score)d	29.3 ± 2.5		30.4 ± 2.6		0.39
Car-Dependent (0–49)		123 (77.9)		118 (77.1)
Somewhat Walkable (50–70)		25 (15.8)		23 (15.0)
Very Walkable (70–100)		10 (6.3)		12 (7.8)
	Partial Pearson Correlatione	P	Partial Pearson Correlatione	P	Pinteractiona
Perceived Walkability versus Objective Walkability	0.62	<.0001	0.65	<.0001	0.42

Abbreviations: CCS, childhood cancer survivors; PA, physical activity; SE, standard error.

^aAdjusted for body mass index, income, smoking, and clustering of matched participants (matched on sex, age, and location).

^bMeasured on four-point Likert scales, where 1=strongly disagree, 2=somewhat disagree, 3=somewhat agree, and 4=strongly agree that a particular barrier makes it difficult to actively travel.

^cScores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater perceived walkability.

^dWalk Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater walkability.

^eAdjusted for sex and age.