Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Women Q. 2014 Dec 29;39(3):287–304. doi: 10.1177/0361684314560730

Table 4.

Differences in Lifetime Experiences of Discrimination by Race and Gender Among Sexual Minority Adults.

Race
Gender
Black Women (n = 64) % (n) White Women (n = 67) %(n) AOR [95% CI] p Black Men (n = 67) % (n) AOR [95% CI] p
Scope of discrimination
1 Been treated with less courtesy than others 90.6% (58) 91.0% (61) 0.17 [0.02, 1.24] .081 91.0% (61) 0.79 [0.21, 2.97] .739
2 Been treated with less respect than others 85.9% (55) 91.0% (61) 0.49 [0.10, 2.43] .382 91.0% (61) 1.30 [0.37, 4.65] .682
3 Received poorer services than others in restaurants or stores 84.4% (54) 82.1% (55) 0.25 [0.06, 1.04] .056 85.1% (57) 0.77 [0.25, 2.40] .658
4 Experienced people treating you as if you're not smart 81.3% (52) 83.6% (56) 0.89 [0.29, 2.76] .840 85.1% (57) 1.21 [0.44, 3.33] .714
5 Experienced people acting as if they are better than you are 90.6% (58) 89.6% (60) 0.25 [0.05, 1.36] .108 95.5% (64) 1.99 [0.38, 10.46] .417
6 Experienced people acting as if they are afraid of you 73.4% (47) 67.2% (45) 0.43 [0.16, 1.14] .088 86.6% (58) 2.87 [1.01, 8.13] .047
7 Experienced people acting as if they think you are dishonest 73.4% (47) 62.7% (42) 0.40 [0.15, 1.06] .066 70.1% (47) 0.73 [0.33, 1.64] .451
8 Been called names or insulted 85.9% (55) 89.6% (60) 0.49 [0.12, 2.00] .315 89.6% (60) 1.10 [0.35, 3.51] .867

Bases of discrimination
1 Race-based discrimination 89.1% (57) 29.9% (20) 0.02 [0.00, 0.09] <.001 94.0% (63) 1.97 [0.48, 8.11] .346
2 Gender-based discrimination 78.1% (50) 80.6% (54) 1.07 [0.34, 3.32] .913 32.8% (22) 0.10 [0.04, 0.25] <.001
3 Sexual orientation-based discrimination 68.8% (44) 77.6% (52) 1.45 [0.57, 3.72] .436 76.1% (51) 1.53 [0.67, 3.51] .314

Note. AOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Odds ratios were adjusted for age, sexual orientation, education, unemployment, and net financial worth. For analyses of group differences per discrimination act, unadjusted odds ratios did not indicate any significant between-group differences (α = .05). For analyses of group differences per discrimination basis, unadjusted odds ratios showed the same pattern ofbetween-group differences as the adjusted odds ratios.