Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Aug 5;40(10):1996–2002.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.06.009

Table 3. Two-point discrimination comparison within instrumental groups left vs right hands and two-point discrimination comparison within instrumental groups non-dominant vs dominant hands.

Musicians Non-musicians
Total subjects 100 100
Age, average (range) 20.06 (18-28) 20.25 (18-27) P = 0.50
Female 52 61 P = 0.20
Male 48 39
Right handed 93 91 P = 0.60
Left handed 7 9
Two-point discrimination comparison within instrumental groups left vs right hands
Average (SD) left hand two-point discrimination, mm Average (SD) right hand two-point discrimination, mm
Woodwinds 3.0 (0.8) 2.9 (0.8) P = 0.39
Strings 2.9 (0.8) 2.9 (0.8) P = 0.76
Brass 3.4 (0.8) 3.2 (0.8) P = 0.42
Percussion/piano/organ 2.9 (0.9) 2.8 (0.8) P = 0.29
Harp/guitar 2.9 (0.9) 2.7 (0.7) P = 0.09
Left: ANOVA, 5 groups, p = 0.11
Right: ANOVA, 5 groups, p = 0.076
Two-point discrimination comparison within instrumental groups non-dominant vs dominant hands
Average (SD) non-dominant hand two-point discrimination, mm Average (SD) dominant hand two-point discrimination, mm
Woodwinds 3.0 (0.8) 2.9 (0.8) P = 0.39
Strings 2.9 (0.8) 2.9 (0.8) P = 0.70
Brass 3.4 (0.8) 3.2 (0.8) P = 0.42
Percussion/piano/organ 2.9 (0.9) 2.8 (0.8) P = 0.66
Harp/guitar 3.0 (0.8) 2.6 (0.7) P = 0.02
Non-dominant: ANOVA, 5 groups, p = 0.093
Dominant: ANOVA, 5 groups, p = 0.085

SD = standard deviation