Table 3.
Variables (% sprint 1) | Sprints | ANOVA p-value (partial eta-squared) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 8 | 9 | 12 | Condition | Time | Interaction | |
RMS vastus lateralis | |||||||
SL | 96.1±10.0a | 94.2±13.0 | 97.7±10.9 | 94.3±11.9 | 0.977 | 0.024 | 0.923 |
MH | 95.4±13.0a | 95.0±12.6 | 98.0±12.3 | 93.9±16.0 | (0.02) | (0.21) | (0.03) |
SH | 99.2±8.4a | 93.2±10.0 | 94.4±13.8 | 92.9±14.4 | |||
RMS rectus femoris | |||||||
SL | 99.9±5.2a | 96.4±7.6ab | 98.8±8.6c | 99.0±10.6 | 0.186 | <0.001 | 0.167 |
MH | 89.6±10.9a | 88.8±8.8ab | 97.5±11.6c | 95.1±14.1 | (0.14) | (0.42) | (0.13) |
SH | 94.1±10.3a | 87.6±13.1ab | 94.2±13.2c | 89.3±16.4 | |||
RMS biceps femoris | |||||||
SL | 96.2±7.2 | 95.9±10.9 | 90.0±16.4 | 90.1±18.7 | 0.208 | 0.046 | 0.509 |
MH | 99.3±12.2 | 94.8±13.0 | 95.1±15.6 | 94.4±11.8 | (0.12) | (0.23) | (0.07) |
SH | 105.1±6.1 | 101.7±10.8 | 94.2±11.2 | 97.1±14.9 | |||
RMS gastrocnemius medialis | |||||||
SL | 98.7±9.3 | 99.4±9.2 | 92.9±12.3 | 93.3±8.8a | 0.886 | 0.027 | 0.341 |
MH | 94.8±7.4 | 92.7±10.6 | 96.0±11.1 | 95.2±11.5a | (0.01) | (0.20) | (0.09) |
SH | 97.8±10.0 | 97.4±10.9 | 95.0±9.8 | 94.3±10.0a | |||
RMS gastrocnemius lateralis | |||||||
SL | 96.8±5.1 | 99.9±9.3 | 95.1±7.7a | 98.9±12.2 | 0.264 | 0.011 | 0.607 |
MH | 97.4±6.3 | 94.4±11.5 | 94.9±12.6a | 94.1±8.3 | (0.11) | (0.23) | (0.06) |
SH | 95.8±9.4 | 94.6±10.7 | 91.7±12.3a | 91.2±11.2 | |||
RMS tibialis anterior | |||||||
SL | 97.2±9.3 | 99.7±10.8 | 96.3±6.9 | 98.2±11.5 | 0.663 | 0.011 | 0.605 |
MH | 97.5±5.9 | 94.5±10.1 | 96.3±15.8 | 93.3±13.9 | (0.03) | (0.23) | (0.06) |
SH | 97.9±5.6 | 95.7±11.0 | 91.8±8.4 | 96.7±6.5 |
Mean ± SD (n = 13). The repeated-sprint exercise protocol included a first set of 8 sprints performed at sea level (SL), moderate (MH) or severe hypoxia (SH), while the second set of 4 sprints was always performed at SL.
significant different from sprint 1, 4, and 8, respectively (P < 0.05).