Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 28;2015:1101.
Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Fatigue severity

RCT
3-armed trial
278 adults with CFS (CDC criteria)
In review
Improvement in fatigue severity (Checklist Individual Strength [CIS-fatigue]) 8 months
27/83 (33%) with CBT
10/80 (13%) with guided support

RR 2.6 for CBT v guided support
95% CI 1.3 to 5.0
RCT had high withdrawal rate; see Further information on studies for full details
Moderate effect size CBT

RCT
3-armed trial
278 adults with CFS (CDC criteria)
In review
Improvement in fatigue severity (self-reported) 8 months
42/74 (57%) with CBT
12/71 (17%) with guided support

RR 3.4 for CBT v guided support
95% 1.9 to 5.8
RCT had high withdrawal rate; see Further information on studies for full details
Moderate effect size CBT

RCT
3-armed trial
278 adults with CFS (CDC criteria)
In review
Improvement in fatigue severity (CIS-fatigue) 8 months
27/83 (33%) with CBT
8/62 (13%) with no intervention

RR 2.5 for CBT v no intervention
95% CI 1.2 to 5.2
RCT had high withdrawal rate; see Further information on studies for full details
Moderate effect size CBT

RCT
3-armed trial
278 adults with CFS (CDC criteria)
In review
Improvement in fatigue severity (self-reported) 8 months
42/74 (57%) with CBT
23/78 (30%) with no intervention

RR 1.9 for CBT v no intervention
95% CI 1.3 to 2.9
RCT had high withdrawal rate; see Further information on studies for full details
Small effect size CBT

RCT
3-armed trial
153 adults with CFS (CDC criteria)
In review
Change in fatigue severity (Chalder Fatigue Score)
with group CBT
with usual care
Absolute results not reported

Difference –2.61 for group CBT v usual care
95% CI –4.92 to –0.30
P = 0.03
Effect size not calculated CBT

RCT
3-armed trial
153 adults with CFS, CDC criteria
In review
Change in fatigue severity (Chalder Fatigue Score)
with group CBT
with education and support
Absolute results not reported

Difference –3.16 for group CBT v education and support
95% CI –5.59 to –0.74
P = 0.011
Effect size not calculated CBT

RCT
4-armed trial
90 adults with a mean age of 39.6 years who fulfilled diagnostic criteria for CFS (not further defined)
In review
Mean fatigue score (profile of mood states subscale) 7 months (3 months after completion of treatment)
16.8 with CBT plus placebo
17.3 with usual care plus placebo

Significance not assessed

RCT
4-armed trial
114 adults with CFS (as defined by CDC criteria); baseline fatigue severity scale (FSS) scores 6.05 in people having CBT, 5.82 in people having relaxation therapy
In review
Mean score on FSS 12 months
5.37 with CBT
5.62 with relaxation therapy

Significance not assessed

RCT
69 children and adolescents aged 10 to 17 years with CFS (CDC criteria) Change in fatigue severity score (Checklist Individual Strength [CIS-fatigue]) 5 months
–22.3 with CBT
–7.6 with no intervention

Absolute difference 14.5
95% CI 7.4 to 21.6
Effect size not calculated CBT

RCT
63 adolescents aged 11–18 years with CFS (CDC or Oxford criteria)
In review
Mean fatigue score (Chalder Fatigue Scale) 6 months post treatment
13.3 with family-focused CBT
14.2 with psycho-education

Treatment effect +0.24
95% CI –3.61 to +4.10
P = 0.9
Not significant

RCT
131 adolescents aged 12–18 years with CFS (CDC criteria)
In review
Fatigue severity (CIS-20) 6 months
24.0 with internet CBT
42.3 with usual care

Mean difference –18.3
95% CI –22.9 to –13.7
P <0.0001
Effect size not calculated CBT

RCT
4-armed trial
641 adults with CFS (Oxford criteria) Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire 24 weeks
21.5 with CBT
24.0 with specialist medical care

Significance not assessed

RCT
4-armed trial
641 adults with CFS (Oxford criteria) Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire 52 weeks
20.3 with CBT
23.8 with specialist medical care

Mean difference –3.4
95% CI –5.0 to –1.8
P = 0.0001
Effect size not calculated CBT