Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 27;62(38):787–792.

TABLE 1.

Influenza vaccination coverage among women who were pregnant at any time during October 2012–January 2013, by selected characteristics — Internet panel survey, United States, 2012–13 influenza season

Characteristic Unweighted no. Weighted % Weighted % vaccinated*
Total 1,702 100.0 50.5
 Vaccinated before pregnancy 239 14.6
 Vaccinated during pregnancy 638 35.9
  1st trimester 273 15.7
  2nd trimester 200 10.6
  3rd trimester 138 8.1
 Unvaccinated 776 49.5
Age group (yrs)
 18–24 477 33.1 48.7
 25–34 970 50.5 50.5
 35–49 255 16.3 54.1
Race/Ethnicity
 White, non-Hispanic 1,093 50.3 52.2
 Black, non-Hispanic 175 18.8 45.4
 Hispanic 278 23.8 50.1
 Other, non-Hispanic 156 7.2 53.1
Education
 Less than college degree 844 51.8 43.9
 College degree 656 36.8 57.3
 More than college degree 202 11.4 58.5
Married
 Yes 1,120 62.2 54.8
 No 582 37.8 43.5
Health insurance coverage
 Any public 659 41.8 50.0
 Private/Military only 939 51.7 53.0
 No insurance 104 6.5 33.7
Working status
 No 860 50.4 44.7
 Yes 842 49.6 56.4
Poverty status §
 Below poverty level 404 26.0 41.6
 At or above poverty level 1,289 74.0 53.8
High-risk conditions
 Yes 613 36.3 57.8
 No 1,089 63.7 46.4
No. of provider visits since July 2012
 0 27 1.5 **
 1–5 682 41.6 48.0
 6–10 598 34.9 53.1
 >10 395 21.9 53.1
Reported provider recommendation and/or offer ††
 Recommendation and offer 895 54.6 70.5
 Recommendation but no offer 270 16.7 46.3
 No recommendation 455 28.7 16.1
Attitude toward efficacy of influenza vaccination §§
 Negative 430 25.2 9.8
 Positive 1,272 74.8 64.2
Attitude toward safety of influenza vaccination ¶¶
 Negative 475 28.7 13.0
 Positive 1,227 71.3 65.6
Attitude toward influenza infection ***
 Not concerned 686 39.5 47.1
 Concerned 1,016 60.5 52.8
*

Women who reported being vaccinated since July 2012 and being vaccinated either before or during pregnancy were defined as vaccinated. Overall, 2.9% of women reported vaccination after pregnancy and were categorized as unvaccinated during pregnancy. The revised estimates for the 2010–11 and 2011–12 influenza seasons using the 2012–13 definition were 44.0% and 47.6%, respectively (CDC, unpublished data, 2013).

Those who were employed for wages or self-employed were categorized as working. Those who were out of work, homemakers, students, retired, or unable to work were grouped as not working.

§

Below poverty were defined as a total of annual family income of <$23,283 for a family of four with two minors as of 2012, as determined by the U.S. Census Bureau (information available at http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/threshld).

Conditions associated with increased risk for serious medical complication from influenza, including chronic asthma, a lung condition other than asthma, a heart condition, diabetes, a kidney condition, a liver condition, obesity, or a weakened immune system caused by a chronic illness or by medications taken for a chronic illness.

**

Sample size was <30; vaccination coverage estimates were not reliable.

††

Excluded women who did not visit a provider since July 2012 (n = 27) and women who did not respond or did not know whether they received a provider offer (n = 55).

§§

Composite variable created based on responses to two questions regarding attitudes toward influenza vaccination: 1) “Flu vaccine is somewhat/very effective in preventing flu” and 2) “Agree/Strongly agree that if a pregnant woman receives the flu vaccination, it will protect the baby from getting the flu after it is born.” One point was given for each “yes” answer for either of the two questions. Respondents who had a summary score of 1 or 2 were defined as having a “positive” attitude, and those with a summary score of 0 were defined as having a “negative” attitude.

¶¶

Composite variable created based on responses to three questions regarding attitudes toward influenza vaccination: 1) “Flu vaccination is somewhat/ very/completely safe for most adult women,” 2) “Flu vaccination is somewhat/ very/completely safe for pregnant women,” and 3) “Flu vaccination that a pregnant women receives is somewhat/very/completely safe for her baby.” One point was given for each “yes” answer to any of the three questions. Respondents who had a summary score of 2 or 3 were defined as having a “positive” attitude, and those with a summary score of 0 or 1 were defined as having a “negative” attitude.

***

Variable created based on response to a question regarding attitude toward influenza infection: “If a pregnant woman gets the flu, it is somewhat/very likely to harm the baby.” Respondents with a “yes” answer were defined as “concerned,” and respondents with a “no” answer were defined as “not concerned.”