Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 8;62(44):877–880.

TABLE 2.

Proportion of television alcohol advertising exposures to underage youths* that exceeded voluntary and proposed thresholds for underage audience composition, by market — United States, 2010

Local markets Local market population aged 12–20 yrs (%) Total no. of youth advertising exposures (000s) Youth television advertising exposures exceeding audience composition thresholds (%)

>30% audience >15% audience
Top five markets by proportion >30%
 Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne, Florida (11.6) 24,078 (45.4) (59.6)
 Houston, Texas (13.7) 32,683 (43.0) (61.6)
 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (11.9) 13,319 (40.9) (59.1)
 Tampa-St. Petersburg (Sarasota), Florida (11.0) 24,326 (40.8) (57.9)
 Detroit. Michigan (13.3) 25,749 (39.0) (63.5)
Bottom five markets by proportion >30%
 Charlotte, North Carolina (12.3) 15,833 (29.4) (56.9)
 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, California (11.3) 22,484 (29.3) (47.1)
 Boston (Manchester), Massachusetts (12.0) 28,858 (26.5) (42.0)
 Sacramento-Stockton-Modesto, California (13.6) 17,567 (25.6) (48.4)
 Washington, DC (Hagerstown) (12.1) 27,022 (25.2) (43.7)
Total impressions 797,571 (33.3) (54.4)

Source: The Nielsen Company, New York, New York.

*

Aged 12–20 years.

The alcohol industry voluntarily agreed not to advertise on television programs where >30% of the audience is reasonably expected to be aged <21 years, here assessed as viewers ages 2–20 years. The National Research Council/Institute of Medicine proposed that “the industry standard should move toward a 15% threshold for television advertising,” assessed here for programming for which >15% of all viewers aged ≥12 years were aged 12–20 years.