Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Sep 18;5:14163. doi: 10.1038/srep14163

Large Scale Synthesis and Light Emitting Fibers of Tailor-Made Graphene Quantum Dots

Hun Park 1, Sung Hyun Noh 1, Ji Hye Lee 2, Won Jun Lee 3, Jae Yun Jaung 1, Seung Geol Lee 2,a, Tae Hee Han 1,b
PMCID: PMC4585659  PMID: 26383257

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO), which is an oxidized form of graphene, has a mixed structure consisting of graphitic crystallites of sp2 hybridized carbon and amorphous regions. In this work, we present a straightforward route for preparing graphene-based quantum dots (GQDs) by extraction of the crystallites from the amorphous matrix of the GO sheets. GQDs with controlled functionality are readily prepared by varying the reaction temperature, which results in precise tunability of their optical properties. Here, it was concluded that the tunable optical properties of GQDs are a result of the different fraction of chemical functionalities present. The synthesis approach presented in this paper provides an efficient strategy for achieving large-scale production and long-time optical stability of the GQDs, and the hybrid assembly of GQD and polymer has potential applications as photoluminescent fibers or films.

Graphene oxide (GO) is separated from the bulk graphite powders via a chemical oxidation process1,2, and is therefore decorated with a variety of oxygen-containing functional groups such as hydroxyl, epoxide, and carboxylic groups3. Unlike the highly crystalline graphene, GO is viewed as a unique 2D random block copolymer with both crystalline and amorphous defect regions, owing to the presence of sp3 carbon and oxygen functional groups4,5. However, the defect sites on GO have blocked practical application of GO materials due to insufficient electrical conductivity4,6. In this regard, many strategies such as thermal annealing7, vapor-mediated reduction8, and hetero-atomic doping9,10,11 have been studied to overcome those drawbacks without losing superior chemical reactivity of GO. Different from the conventional defect restoration approaches12,13,14,15, our steam activation method has been appreciated for its selective decomposition of the defective areas with less energy, leading to nanoporous GO6. In this strategy, controlling the defects in GO provides a useful tool for controlling its morphology, thereby offering an efficient route for the preparation of functional carbon nanomaterials. Furthermore, complete elimination of defects is possible, which would leave behind graphitic domains that are optically active functional nanomaterials.

Graphene-based quantum dots (GQDs) have been extensively investigated owing to the various advantages they possess, including non-toxicity, easy synthesis procedures, and controllable chemical functionality16,17,18,19,20,21. So far, several approaches including molecular assembly of carbon ring structures22,23, chemical exfoliation of graphite nanofibers17,24, modification of graphite nanoparticles25, and a hydrothermal route resulting in the fracture of GO sheets into ultra-small pieces26,27,28,29, have been studied to synthesize GQDs. However, challenges such as low synthesis yields resulting from the formation of highly aggregated graphene monoliths, still exist and need to be overcome18,26. In addition, poor optical properties such as low quantum yield (QY), poor control of the emission wavelength and optical instability, limit direct applications30,31.

Herein, we introduce a one-step synthesis procedure for producing GQDs with high QY and long-term optical stability via the extraction of GQDs from GO. GQDs were prepared with high production yields by using small amounts of environmentally benign chemicals, such as H2O2 and NH3. Additionally, when employed together, these chemicals effectively extracted GQDs from GO, and simultaneously decorated GQDs with controllable functionalities. The controlled introduction of functional groups was achieved by changing the reaction temperature, which resulted in the ability to precisely tune their optical properties. Our strategy, namely the selective elimination of defects in GO sheets, offers a novel pathway to produce GQDs from the bulk graphite powders in large quantities with high QY and also enables the production of novel GQDs-based polymeric composites, such as photoluminescent fibers and films.

Results and Discussion

A schematic illustration of vapor-phase etching on single-layer GO sheets, which serves as a tool for directly observing the formation of GQDs, is shown in Fig. 1a. Firstly, single GO layers were coated on SiO2/Si substrates using the Langmuir-Blodgett technique32. Subsequently, each substrate was suspended in a Teflon vessel prefilled with an aqueous solution, which acted as the vapor source. The vessel was then sealed in a stainless steel autoclave and heated at 150 °C. Figure 1b shows a topographic image of the deposited GO sheets. The corresponding height profile indicates that the thickness of the GO sheets is about 1.6 nm. After the GO sheets were exposed to H2O2 vapor, which is widely known as peroxide etchant, for 25 min, pores were evenly generated over the GO sheets, as shown in Figure S1a. The corresponding height profile also confirms the generation of pores on the GO sheets. However, the GO sheets almost entirely disappeared with a few additional minutes (5 min) of vapor treatment (Fig. 1c) and its thickness was significantly reduced to less than 1 nm, indicating the chemical decomposition of GO. Compared to our previous report on steam-activated GO6, the use of peroxide etchant resulted in a fast etching reaction of the GO sheets. The vigorous reaction rate of H2O2 can be retarded by addition of a small amount of NH3, since NH3 provides a basic pH condition that induces the chemical decomposition of H2O2 into H2O and O233,34. Figure 1d shows an AFM image of GO acquired after vapor etching with a solution mixture containing NH3, H2O2, and deionized water (DIW) for 30 min at 150 °C. Interestingly, in contrast to the H2O2-treated GO, the GO etched with above solution mixture was not greatly decomposed and still retained the porous structure. The inset in Fig. 1d indicates that the porous GO sheet consisted of many isolated dots of an average thickness of 1.6 nm, which were distributed homogeneously throughout the basal plane of the sheet. The observations in Fig. 1 indicate that the NH3/H2O2/DIW solution mixture is an efficient etchant for generating finite-sized dots in GO.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic diagram showing the vapor-phase etching process on GO. First, GO monolayers were deposited on substrates by Langmuir-Blodgett technique, following which the substrates were suspended in a sealed vessel prefilled with the etching solution mixture. The vessel was then heated at 150 °C to allow the vapor-phase reaction to occur. AFM images of (b) pristine GO and GO sheets etched with a H2O2/DIW solution mixture for (c) 30 min. The corresponding height profiles are measured along the white lines. (d) AFM image of a GO sheet etched with a NH3/H2O2/DIW solution mixture for 30 min. All the scale bars in the insets represent 1 nm for height (I) and 100 nm for length (−). (e,f) TEM images of steam-activated GO sheets suspended on a lacey carbon grid at (e) low magnification and (f) high magnification.

To further investigate the crystalline properties of the remaining dots, GO sheets loaded on a carbon-coated transmission electron microscopy (TEM) grid were treated with steam for 20 h at 200 °C and their crystalline morphologies were characterized using TEM. Figure 1e shows an image of the GO sheets suspended on a lacey carbon grid after steam-activation. Perforated GO sheets with nanopores were clearly observed even at low magnification (Fig. 1e). At higher magnifications (Fig. 1f), highly crystalline particles (which would be GQDs), as indicated with white dot circles, were clearly noticed as the pores grew preferentially along the amorphous matrix. Figure S1b shows that the electron diffraction pattern of steam-etched GO network containing GQDs (left) is similar to that of the GO crystalline structure (right). Evolution of pores indicates that the amorphous defective areas of sp3 carbon or oxygenated sites disappeared during the etching process. Indeed, this implies that GO sheets contain crystalline GQDs within an amorphous matrix.

Taken together, selective etching of the defective areas and spontaneous extraction of the embedded crystallites are an effective strategy to produce GQDs (Fig. 2a). The observations made during the vapor etching of GO sheets were utilized for developing a solution-based synthesis process for large-scale preparation of GQDs. Figure 2a presents a schematic illustration of the solution phase GQDs synthesis process. A dark brown colored aqueous GO dispersion (0.2 wt%) was mixed with H2O2 solution and heated at 150 °C in a closed vessel of a Teflon-lined autoclave for 5 h. After the reaction, the solution was clear and exhibited no photoluminescence (PL) response to excitation at 350 nm (Figure S2). As previously confirmed in the vapor etching experiments, H2O2 is a harsh etchant with peroxide radicals, as a result of which GO was completely decomposed. However, when NH4OH was added to the solution mixture, the filtrate was orange under white light (Fig. 2a) and emitted yellow light when exposed to 365 nm UV light (Fig. 2b). As shown in Fig. 2c, under excitation at 350 nm, the emission peak position (λem) of GQDs synthesized at 150 °C (GQDs@150 °C) was at 520 nm. As shown in Raman spectra of Figure S3, GQDs@150oC shows a decreased ID/IG ratio of 0.80 from 0.86 of GO. It suggests that the etching reaction successfully removes the amorphous regions of GO sheets. Furthermore, changes in the reaction temperature permitted a straightforward control of PL properties. As shown in Fig. 2b, the GQDs synthesized at 200 °C (GQDs@200 °C) and 300 °C (GQDs@300 °C) exhibited green and blue fluorescence, respectively, under UV excitation at 365 nm. The PL spectra (Fig. 2c) obtained by excitation at 350 nm showed a significant red shift of the PL peak position from 430 nm to 520 nm as the reaction temperature was decreased from 300 °C to 150 °C. As drawn in CIE color coordinates (1931) derived from the emission spectra (Fig. 2d), GQDs with diverse emission properties were directly synthesized by controlling the reaction temperature. Indeed, the synthesized GQDs exhibited high QY even without additional modifications, such as polymeric hybridization with polyethylene glycol19. As summarized in Table S1, blue, green, and yellow light-emitting GQDs exhibited QYs of 16, 15, and 8.4%, respectively, which are relatively high values compared to previously synthesized graphene-derived QDs30,31,35. More interestingly, the sedimentation of GQD colloids was not observed and the QYs of as-prepared GQDs did not significantly decrease even 12 months after synthesis (Fig. 2e and S4), implying the stable colloidal properties of GQDs.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic drawing illustrating the solution-phase etching of GO sheets to prepare GQDs. An aqueous GO dispersion (0.2 wt. %) was mixed with NH4OH and H2O2 in a sealed vessel, and was directly heated at 150 °C for 5 h. After allowing the resulting solution to naturally cool, it was filtered. (b) Photographs of the GQDs dispersions, prepared at 150, 200, and 300 °C from left to right, under 365 nm UV light. (c) Comparison of the PL spectra of the GQDs. (d) CIE color coordinates (1931) derived from the emission spectra presented in (c). (e) Variation of relative quantum yields of GQDs vs. time for 12 months.

TEM images of the GQDs synthesized at 150, 200, and 300 °C are shown in Figure S5a–c. A high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) image (Figure S5d) of a GQD synthesized at 300 °C provides an estimate of its diameter. Further, the image indicates that highly crystalline lattice fringes have a lattice spacing of about 0.21 nm, which is well-matched with the in-plane lattice spacing of (100) planes in graphene (d100 = 0.213 nm)36. The size distributions (Figure S5e) of the GQDs were plotted by measuring the size of more than 100 GQDs from TEM images. The average diameters of GQDs were calculated to be about 2.0, 2.1, and 2.1 nm for GQDs synthesized at 150, 200, and 300 °C, respectively. Based on these results, it should be noted that the size of the GQDs is not greatly dependent on the synthesis temperature. Therefore, it appears that the large differences in emission behavior of GQDs synthesized at different temperatures are not due to the size of the GQDs, but rather a result of the different chemical functionalities.

The chemical properties of GO and yellow GQDs (synthesis temperature: 150 °C) were compared by analyzing their Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra, as shown in Fig. 3a. GO contains various kinds of oxygen-containing functional groups, such as epoxide, carbonyl/carboxyl, and hydroxyl/carboxyl groups exhibiting peaks at 1053, 1820/1735, and 3400 cm−1, respectively. Interestingly, in the case of GQDs, the introduction of nitrogen atoms into graphene results in the appearance of peaks corresponding to new vibration modes of C-N stretching (amine/amide, 1400/1450 cm−1), C=O stretching (amide, 1600 cm−1), and N-H stretching (amine/amide, 3000–3500 cm−1). In addition, while GO does not show peaks in the N1s XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) spectrum (Fig. 3b), GQDs show peaks at 399.4 and 400.6 eV, which are attributed to primary amine and amide, respectively. From the high-resolution XPS data, N/C atomic ratios of GQDs were calculated (Figure S6). It may be noted that the yellow GQDs (synthesis temperature: 150 °C) were decorated with more amine than amide groups. On the other hand, the major nitrogen functionality of blue GQDs (synthesis temperature: 300 °C) was amide.

Figure 3. Chemical composition of GQDs.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) FT-IR spectra of GO and GQDs. The IR pattern of GO suggests the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups, such as epoxide, carbonyl, and hydroxyl groups. The IR spectra of GQDs contained new peaks corresponding to amine and amide functionalities. (b) XPS N1s spectra of GO and GQDs. Although the XPS spectrum of GO does not show a nitrogen peak, the XPS spectra of GQDs show two new peaks at 399.4 and 400.6 eV, corresponding to primary amine and amide, respectively. (c) Band gaps of GQD-(NH2)n and GQD-(NH2C=O)n as a function of the number of amine and amide functional groups. Gray, white, blue, and red colors on the atomic structures represent carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen, respectively.

Based on these observations, we used quantum mechanical Density Functional Theory (DFT) to understand the underlying fundamental effects of amine and amide functionalities on the optical properties of GQDs. We considered two types of GQD structures functionalized with various numbers ( = 1–6) of amine (GQD-(NH2)n) or amide groups (GQD-(NH2C=O)n). The functional groups were located at para (p)-sites only because the GQDs with amine and amide groups at the para (p)-sites exhibited lower energy compared to the corresponding GQDs with amine and amide groups at meta (m)-sites (Figure S7). Among various configurations (Figures S8 and S9), we focused on the structure with the lowest energy for each number of functional groups and calculated the band gaps of GQDs after geometry optimization, as shown in Fig. 3c. The band gaps of both the GQDs tend to gradually decrease with an increase in the number of functional groups. The band gap of GQD-(NH2)6 (2.053 eV) was significantly decreased compared to that of pure GQD (2.471 eV), indicating red shift. Meanwhile, GQD-(NH2C=O)6 (2.323 eV) showed a band gap shift of −0.148 eV from that of pure GQD. The results indicate that the presence of amine functional groups on the GQDs leads to a stronger tendency for shifting λem towards longer wavelengths than that of amide functional groups. Therefore, GQDs containing more amine functionalities emit yellow light, whereas GQDs prepared at higher temperatures emit blue light, owing to fewer amine functionalities in the latter case. Therefore, we conclude that the difference in optical properties of the GQDs prepared at different temperatures originates from the chemical functionalities.

Table 1 compares GQDs fabricated in this work with those reported in other literatures. Yellow GQDs (synthesized at 150 °C), green GQDs (synthesized at 200 °C), and blue GQDs (synthesized at 300 °C) were obtained with synthesis yields of about 70 wt%, 72 wt%, and 58 wt%, respectively. Our strategy provides a straightforward route for synthesizing GQDs in large quantities and could be beneficial for potential applications in the synthesis of GQD-based composites with unique emitting properties. Figure 4a shows a photograph of freeze-dried GQD powders (about 50 mg) prepared from 40 mL of GO solution (0.2 wt%). To demonstrate the potential applications of GQDs in composites, GQD powders were mixed with poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) and the viscous GQDs-PAA mixture was hand-drawn to prepare microfibers. To date, the construction of QD-based polymeric composites is a huge challenge because the redispersion of solidified QDs was largely limited due to its severe aggregation and the composites often showed low optical activities. Our GQD powders were successfully dispersed in a polymeric matrix at a high concentration and the several meters long mechanically flexible GQDs fibers were readily taken up on a steel rod (Fig. 4b). On the surface of steel drum, fibers with about 5 μm in diameter containing GQDs@150 °C are clearly shown (Fig. 4c). Under 365 nm UV excitation, GQD fibers are emitting the strong yellow light as shown in Fig. 4d. For comparison, PAA fibers were also prepared in the same manner without adding GQD powders and twisted with GQD fibers (indicated by the white arrow in Fig. 4e). Under UV excitation, fibers containing GQDs synthesized at 300 °C emitted strong blue light, whereas non-fluorescent PAA fibers were not detectable (Fig. 4f). In addition, mechanically stable GQD fibers were interwoven in other textiles and solely emitted blue light (Fig. 4g,h). GQDs nanocomposites were also drop-casted in a circular-shaped mold having a diameter of 3.5 cm. Figure 4i shows the yellow light emitting GQDs-PAA composite films containing GQDs synthesized at 150 °C. As shown in the inset, the film was almost transparent under white light, whereas it exhibited fluorescence upon UV irradiation. It may be noted that the emitted light from the films was not localized, indicating that GQD powder was homogeneously mixed within the PAA matrix.

Table 1. Comparison of GQDs synthesized from various methods.

Precursor Synthetic method Quantum yield (%) (Color) Production yield (wt%) Ref.
Graphene oxide Selective elimination of defective (amorphous) area (Top-down) 8 (Yellow) 70 this work
15 (Green) 72
16 (Blue) 58
Graphite Oxidative cutting/post-functionalization (Top-down) 2 (White) N/A 45
Graphite Intercalation compound-assisted exfoliation (Top-down) 4 (Blue) N/A 46
Carbon soot Thermal plasma jet (Top-down) 13 (Blue) N/A 47
Graphite Electrochemical oxidation (Top-down) N/A 40 48
Glucose Microwave-assisted hydrothermal (Bottom-up) 11 (Blue) 78 49
Glycerol Microwave-assisted pyrolysis (Bottom-up) N/A 10 50
Open in a new tab

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Photograph of freeze-dried GQD powders. Images of long GQD fibers taken up on a steel drum (diameter, 7 mm) under (b) low magnification and (c) high magnification. (d) GQDs fibers emitting a strong yellow light under UV lamp (365 nm). Optical microscopic images of blue GQD/PAA composite fibers entwisted with PAA fibers under (e) bright-field conditions and (f) UV illumination. Photographs of three strands of GQD yarn woven with a commercial cotton fabric under (g) white light and (h) UV irradiation. The white arrow in (e) points to the PAA fibers. (i) Photographs of a yellow GQD/PAA composite film under UV lamp (365 nm) and (inset) white light.

Conclusions

In this study, we have showed that GO is a promising platform for the preparation of GQDs. GO has a unique molecular structure with a mixture of crystalline graphitic region and amorphous defect sites. The extraction of graphite domains from GO could be an effective pathway for the preparation of GQDs. Motivated by the successful gas-phase etching on GO, a solution-based hydrothermal reaction was designed by introducing H2O2 and NH3. GQDs with high QYs and high process yields were synthesized through the designed processes, which did not involve any complicated procedures. Our straightforward route provides a highly efficient method for producing optically tuned GQDs for applications in polymeric composites such as fibers or films.

Materials and Methods

Synthesis of GO

GO was prepared from graphite powder (Bay Carbon, SP-1) using the modified Hummers method, which has been reported elsewhere37,38,39. GO was washed with 1 M HCl by vacuum-assisted filtration and was then dialyzed using a dialysis membrane (Spectra Dialysis Membrane, MWCO: 6,000–8,000) for 15 days to remove the salt byproduct and excess acid. GO powders were obtained by freeze-drying the aqueous GO solution using a lyophilizer (Ilshin, FD 8518).

Vapor-phase etching of GO

The prepared GO was deposited on SiO2/Si substrates using the Langmuir-Blodgett technique6,32. GO-deposited SiO2/Si substrates were suspended in a glass pipette and placed in a 50 mL Teflon vessel pre-filled with a solution mixture containing 10 mL of deionized water (DIW; Millipore, Direct Q3), 0.5 mL of NH4OH (Sigma-Aldrich, 30% NH3 basis), and 1 mL of H2O2 (Sigma-Aldrich, 30% (w/w) in H2O). The Teflon vessel was sealed in an autoclave and heated to 150 °C. To observe the intermediate stages of steam etching, GO sheets suspended on a lacey carbon grid were exposed to water vapor at 200 °C for 20 h.

Solution-phase etching of GO

The GO powder (0.2 wt%) was re-dispersed in 10 mL of DIW by mechanical agitation. Subsequently, 0.5 mL of NH4OH and 1 mL of H2O2 were added to the dispersion and the mixture was further stirred for 10 min at room temperature. The mixture was then transferred to a 50 mL Teflon vessel and sealed in an autoclave. After heating at 150 °C – 300 oC for 5 h, the solution was naturally cooled down to room temperature and filtered with a 0.02-μm syringe filter (Whatman, Anotop 10) to remove any flocculated aggregates. The filtrate was stirred and heated at 100 °C for 1 h to remove any remaining NH3.

Preparation of GQD fibers and films

10 mg of freeze-dried GQD powders and 1 g of poly(acrylic acid) (PAA; Sigma-Aldrich, Mv  ~ 450,000) were mechanically mixed in 6 mL of DIW, and the viscous mixture was degassed at room temperature under vacuum for 1 h to remove bubbles. GQD fibers were spun from the viscous mixture. Bare PAA fibers were also fabricated by following the same method without adding GQD powders. GQD films were prepared by drop-casting the mixture on a circular-shaped mold having a diameter of 3.5 cm. The spun fibers and films were dried at ambient conditions to remove any residual water.

Characterization

GO sheets and GQDs were characterized using an atomic force microscopy (AFM; Park Systems, XE-70) in the tapping mode and a transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEOL, JEM-2100F) operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. TEM samples were prepared on lacey-carbon TEM grids (Ted Pella, Inc.). PL and QY measurements were carried out using a fluorescence spectrometer (Scinco, FS-2) and a UV-vis spectrometer (Analytik Jena, Specord200). In order to measure long-term stability, as-prepared GQDs were kept in solution state under ambient conditions over 12 months. Photographs of fluorescent GQD solutions and composite films and fibers were taken using a digital camera (Canon, EOS 600D) with a 356 nm UV lamp (Specroline, ENF-260C/FE). The fluorescent GQD fibers were observed using a fluorescence microscopy (Olympus, BX51/U-RFL-T) with a UV excitation filter (Olympus, U-MNU2). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were carried out using a spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Theta probe) with monochromatic Al Kα radiation. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR; Thermo Scientific, Nicolet 6700) was conducted with KBr pellets. Raman spectroscopy (JASCO, NRS-3100) was performed with 514 nm laser excitation.

Computational Details

Fully optimized structures of GQDs were obtained using DFT calculations. All the first-principle calculations were carried out using the DMol3 package40,41 of Material Studios from Accerlys42 with generalized gradient approximation (GGA). The Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) functional43,44 was used to treat the electron exchange-correlation energy of interaction of the electrons, employing the double numerical basis with polarization d and polarization p functions on hydrogen (DNP). Self-consistent field (SCF) convergence of 10−5 Ha was obtained with convergence tolerances of 0.002 Ha/Å for the total force and 0.005 Å for the maximum displacement. Spin polarized calculations were performed in this study. The real space cutoff radius was set to 3.7 Å. The band gap for each configuration of amino-functionalized GQDs refers to the energy difference between the highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMO).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Park, H. et al. Large Scale Synthesis and Light Emitting Fibers of Tailor-Made Graphene Quantum Dots. Sci. Rep. 5, 14163; doi: 10.1038/srep14163 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep14163-s1.pdf (3.6MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge Y.-K. Huang for assistance with the TEM characterization. This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program (NRF 2014R1A1A1004096 and 2014R1A1A1008196), by Energy Efficiency & Resources Program (KETEP 20142010102690), and by the Technology Innovation Program (KEIT 10047756) funded by Korean Government.

Footnotes

Author Contributions T.H.H. conceived the research idea. H.P., S.G.L., W.J.L. and T.H.H. wrote the main manuscript text. H.P., S.H.N., J.H.L. and J.Y.J. performed the experiments. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Hummers W. S. & Offeman R. E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 1339–1339 (1958). [Google Scholar]
  2. Brodie B. C. Sur Le Poids Atomique Du Graphite. Ann. chim. Phys. 59, 466 (1860). [Google Scholar]
  3. Dreyer D. R., Park S., Bielawski C. W. & Ruoff R. S. The Chemistry of Graphene Oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 228–240 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Luo J. Y., Kim J. & Huang J. X. Material Processing of Chemically Modified Graphene: Some Challenges and Solutions. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 2225–2234 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Erickson K. et al. Determination of the Local Chemical Structure of Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide. Adv. Mater. 22, 4467–4472 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Han T. H., Huang Y. K., Tan A. T. L., Dravid V. P. & Huang J. X. Steam Etched Porous Graphene Oxide Network for Chemical Sensing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 15264–15267 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bagri A. et al. Structural Evolution During the Reduction of Chemically Derived Graphene Oxide. Nat. Chem. 2, 581–587 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yang D. et al. Chemical Analysis of Graphene Oxide Films after Heat and Chemical Treatments by X-Ray Photoelectron and Micro-Raman Spectroscopy. Carbon 47, 145–152 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  9. Li X. L. et al. Simultaneous Nitrogen Doping and Reduction of Graphene Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 15939–15944 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Maiti U. N. et al. 25th Anniversary Article: Chemically Modified/Doped Carbon Nanotubes & Graphene for Optimized Nanostructures & Nanodevices. Adv. Mater. 26, 40–67 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee W. J. et al. Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Composite Structures for Energy and Catalytic Applications. Chem. Commun. 50, 6818–6830 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Li D. & Kaner R. B. Materials Science - Graphene-Based Materials. Science 320, 1170–1171 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Park S. & Ruoff R. S. Chemical Methods for the Production of Graphenes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 217–224 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Compton O. C. & Nguyen S. T. Graphene Oxide, Highly Reduced Graphene Oxide, and Graphene: Versatile Building Blocks for Carbon-Based Materials. Small 6, 711–723 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mattevi C. et al. Evolution of Electrical, Chemical, and Structural Properties of Transparent and Conducting Chemically Derived Graphene Thin Films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 2577–2583 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang M. et al. Facile Synthesis of Water-Soluble, Highly Fluorescent Graphene Quantum Dots as a Robust Biological Label for Stem Cells. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 7461–7467 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  17. Peng J. et al. Graphene Quantum Dots Derived from Carbon Fibers. Nano Lett. 12, 844–849 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhu S. J. et al. Strongly Green-Photoluminescent Graphene Quantum Dots for Bioimaging Applications. Chem. Commun. 47, 6858–6860 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tetsuka H. et al. Optically Tunable Amino-Functionalized Graphene Quantum Dots. Adv. Mater. 24, 5333–5338 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jin S. H., Kim D. H., Jun G. H., Hong S. H. & Jeon S. Tuning the Photoluminescence of Graphene Quantum Dots through the Charge Transfer Effect of Functional Groups. ACS Nano 7, 1239–1245 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ananthanarayanan A. et al. Facile Synthesis of Graphene Quantum Dots from 3d Graphene and Their Application for Fe3+Sensing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 3021–3026 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  22. Yan X., Cui X. & Li L. S. Synthesis of Large, Stable Colloidal Graphene Quantum Dots with Tunable Size. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 5944–5945 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu R. L., Wu D. Q., Feng X. L. & Mullen K. Bottom-up Fabrication of Photoluminescent Graphene Quantum Dots with Uniform Morphology. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 15221–15223 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Luo J. Y. et al. Graphene Oxide Nanocolloids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 17667–17669 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu F. et al. Facile Synthetic Method for Pristine Graphene Quantum Dots and Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots: Origin of Blue and Green Luminescence. Adv. Mater. 25, 3657–3662 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pan D. Y., Zhang J. C., Li Z. & Wu M. H. Hydrothermal Route for Cutting Graphene Sheets into Blue-Luminescent Graphene Quantum Dots. Adv. Mater. 22, 734–738 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pan D. Y. et al. Cutting Sp(2) Clusters in Graphene Sheets into Colloidal Graphene Quantum Dots with Strong Green Fluorescence. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 3314–3318 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen S., Liu J. W., Chen M. L., Chen X. W. & Wang J. H. Unusual Emission Transformation of Graphene Quantum Dots Induced by Self-Assembled Aggregation. Chem. Commun. 48, 7637–7639 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lu J. et al. One-Pot Synthesis of Fluorescent Carbon Nanoribbons, Nanoparticles, and Graphene by the Exfoliation of Graphite in Ionic Liquids. ACS Nano 3, 2367–2375 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tang L. B. et al. Deep Ultraviolet Photoluminescence of Water-Soluble Self-Passivated Graphene Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 6, 5102–5110 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lin L. X. & Zhang S. W. Creating High Yield Water Soluble Luminescent Graphene Quantum Dots Via Exfoliating and Disintegrating Carbon Nanotubes and Graphite Flakes. Chem. Commun. 48, 10177–10179 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Cote L. J., Kim F. & Huang J. X. Langmuir-Blodgett Assembly of Graphite Oxide Single Layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 1043–1049 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Bishop D. F., Stern G., Fleischm, M. & Marshall L. S. Hydrogen Peroxide Catalytic Oxidation of Refractory Organics in Municipal Waste Waters. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 7, 110–117 (1968). [Google Scholar]
  34. Kitajima N., Fukuzumi S. & Ono Y. Formation of Superoxide Ion During Decomposition of Hydrogen-Peroxide on Supported Metal-Oxides. J. Phys. Chem. 82, 1505–1509 (1978). [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang F. et al. Influence of Ph on the Fluorescence Properties of Graphene Quantum Dots Using Ozonation Pre-Oxide Hydrothermal Synthesis. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 25471–25479 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  36. Wilson N. R. et al. Graphene Oxide: Structural Analysis and Application as a Highly Transparent Support for Electron Microscopy. ACS Nano 3, 2547–2556 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Han T. H. et al. Peptide/Graphene Hybrid Assembly into Core/Shell Nanowires. Adv. Mater. 22, 2060–2064 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kim J. et al. Graphene Oxide Sheets at Interfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 8180–8186 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Maiti U. N., Lim J., Lee K. E., Lee W. J. & Kim S. O. Three-Dimensional Shape Engineered, Interfacial Gelation of Reduced Graphene Oxide for High Rate, Large Capacity Supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. 26, 615–619 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Delley B. Dmol(3) Dft Studies: From Molecules and Molecular Environments to Surfaces and Solids. Comp. Mater. Sci. 17, 122–126 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  41. Delley B. From Molecules to Solids with the Dmol(3) Approach. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 7756–7764 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  42. Sullivan K. et al. Progressive Deterioration of Patients with Scleroderma with Pulmonary Involvement: 11-Year Outcomes from the Scleroderma Lung Study (Sls1). Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 32, S17–S18 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  43. Perdew J. P., Burke K. & Ernzerhof M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Perdew J. P., Burke K. & Wang Y. Generalized Gradient Approximation for the Exchange-Correlation Hole of a Many-Electron System. Phys. Rev. B 54, 16533–16539 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sekiya R., Uemura Y., Murakami H. & Haino T. White-Light-Emitting Edge-Functionalized Graphene Quantum Dots. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 5619–5623 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Song S. H. et al. Primary Hepatocyte Imaging by Multiphoton Luminescent Graphene Quantum Dots. Chem. Commun. 51, 8041–8043 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kim J. & Suh J. S. Size-Controllable and Low-Cost Fabrication of Graphene Quantum Dots Using Thermal Plasma Jet. ACS Nano 8, 4190–4196 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Volarevic V. et al. Large Graphene Quantum Dots Alleviate Immune-Mediated Liver Damage. ACS Nano 8, 12098–12109 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tang L. B. et al. Deep Ultraviolet to near-Infrared Emission and Photoresponse in Layered N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 8, 6312–6320 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Huang Z. C. et al. Facile Synthesis of Analogous Graphene Quantum Dots with Sp(2) Hybridized Carbon Atom Dominant Structures and Their Photovoltaic Application. Nanoscale 6, 13043–13052 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep14163-s1.pdf (3.6MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES