Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Hepatol. 2014 Sep 10;62(2):286–293. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.08.052

Table 2.

Patient disposition, sustained virologic response, safety profile, and anaemia management.

Boceprevir (n = 455) Telaprevir (n = 1629) All patients (n = 2084)
Patient disposition during treatment, n (%)
 Completed therapy 255 (56) 989 (61) 1244 (60)
 Discontinued early 200 (44) 621 (38) 821 (39)
  Adverse event 83 (18) 290 (18) 373 (18)
  Lack of efficacy 89 (20) 255 (16) 344 (17)
  Lost to follow-up 22 (5) 48 (3) 70 (3)
  Other 6 (1) 28 (2) 34 (2)
 No EOT data 0 19 (1) 19 (<1)
Sustained virologic response, n (%, 95% CI) 200 (44, 39–49) 883 (54, 52–57) 1083 (52, 50–54)
Adverse events, n (%) 422 (93) 1561 (96) 1983 (95)
 Anaemia 310 (68) 1056 (65) 1366 (66)
 Rash 155 (34) 1026 (63) 1181 (57)
 Anorectal symptoms 43 (9) 648 (40) 691 (33)
 Infection 78 (17) 242 (15) 320 (15)
 Dysgeusia 57 (13) 65 (4) 112 (6)
 Decompensating event 12 (3) 56 (3) 68 (3)
Serious adverse events, n (%) 57 (13) 183 (11) 240 (12)
 Anaemia 18 (4) 57 (3) 75 (4)
 Infection 14 (3) 43 (3) 57 (3)
 Other 8 (2) 29 (2) 37 (2)
 Decompensation 3 (<1) 13 (<1) 16 (<1)
 Rash 0 8 (<1)* 8 (<1)
 Anorectal symptoms 0 7 (<1) 7 (<1)
 Dysgeusia 0 0 0
Haemoglobin decline, n (%)
 Haemoglobin <10 g/dl 236 (52) 812 (50) 1048 (50)
 Haemoglobin <8.5 g/dl 69 (15) 285 (17) 354 (17)
Anaemia management, n (%)
 Ribavirin dose reduction 188 (41) 686 (42) 874 (42)
 Epoetin use 182 (40) 580 (36) 762 (37)
 Blood transfusion 44 (10) 193 (12) 237 (11)
 Ribavirin interruptions 16 (4) 41 (3) 57 (3)
Deaths, n 0 5 5
*

SAE rash included 2 patients with DRESS.