Table 3.
A t-test analysis of the future orientation condition and the control condition.
| Future orientation condition(N = 24) |
Control condition (N = 22) |
t | Cohen’s d | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | SD | M | SD | |||
| Gender | 0.38 | 0.49 | 0.27 | 0.46 | 0.73 | 0.22 |
| Age | 28.00 | 5.28 | 27.82 | 6.57 | 0.10 | 0.03 |
| Years of working | 6.79 | 4.79 | 6.55 | 4.93 | 0.17 | 0.05 |
| Positive affect | 30.67 | 7.47 | 28.18 | 7.70 | 1.11 | 0.33 |
| Negative affect | 19.54 | 5.95 | 18.18 | 6.51 | 0.74 | 0.22 |
| CFC-future | 5.29 | 1.60 | 4.05 | 1.59 | 2.65∗ | 0.78 |
| CFC-immediate | 3.58 | 1.38 | 4.09 | 1.85 | -1.06 | -0.31 |
| CFC-general | 11.71 | 2.24 | 9.95 | 2.70 | 2.41∗ | 0.73 |
| Sense of control | 5.27 | 0.60 | 4.77 | 0.88 | 2.26∗ | 0.68 |
| Cyberloafing attitudes | 4.06 | 0.91 | 5.22 | 0.92 | -4.27∗∗∗ | -1.29 |
| Cyberloafing intentions | 3.67 | 0.90 | 5.52 | 1.37 | -5.45∗∗∗ | -1.60 |
Gender was dummy coded such that 0 = “female” and 1 = “male”. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.