Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Jul 20;41(5):1190–1196. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000109

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Manual response time results from Experiment 1 plotted as a function of cue condition (negative, neutral, or positive). Mean correct RT was faster in the positive-cue condition (M=1105.69) than in the neutral-cue condition (M=1420.01), but there was no RT advantage for the negative-cue condition (M=1355.05) compared with the neutral-cue condition. Error bars represent within-subject 95% confidence intervals (Morey, 2008).