Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Jul 20;41(5):1190–1196. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000109

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Participants were split into two groups based on magnitude of positive cue benefit: high group (greatest positive cue benefit, N=13), low group (least positive cue benefit, N=13). Participants in the high group demonstrated a reliable benefit from the negative cue (M=1229.36), relative to the neutral condition (M=1525.19), which replicated the pattern of results found by Arita et al. (2012). Participants in the low group demonstrated no benefit from the negative cue. Error bars represent within-subject 95% confidence intervals (Morey, 2008).