Table 1.
Tumor antigens | Advantages | Challenges | |
---|---|---|---|
Subunit antigens | Polysaccharides | Defined chemical synthesis | Elicitation of humoral rather than cellular immune responses |
Peptides | Ease of production | Poor delivery efficiency | |
Stable vaccine formulations | Monovalent immune response | ||
May not require antigen-processing by APCs | Subject to HLA-specificity | ||
Proteins | Broad-epitope immune responses Wide HLA-specificity |
Poor delivery efficiency | |
Suboptimal for CD8+ T cell responses | |||
Weak immunogenicity of self-antigens | |||
DNA and mRNA | Ease of production | Poor delivery efficiency | |
In situ expression of full-length antigens | Poor in vivo stability | ||
Flexible to encode immune stimulators | Limited transfection efficiency | ||
Whole-cell antigens | Tumor-cell lysate | Broad-epitope immune responses Potential for “personalized” therapy |
Requires tissue biopsy |
Manufacturing challenges | |||
Loss of antigenicity during production | |||
Presence of self-antigens | |||
Immunogenically dying tumor cells | Broad-epitope immune responses | Requires additional therapeutic interventions Presence of self-antigens and immunosuppressive molecules, e.g., PD-L1 |
|
Full preservation of tumor antigens | |||
Potential for “personalized” therapy |