Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct;136(4):e783–e793. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1260

TABLE 3.

Six- and 12-Month Interaction Effects to Examine the Most Effective Combination of ED and Post-ED Session

Variable 6-Month (N = 717) IRR (95% CI) P 12-Month (N = 735) IRR (95% CI) P
Alcohol consumption indexa
 Computer BI 0.93 (0.74–1.17) .5422 0.97 (0.81–1.17) .7431
 Therapist BI 0.80 (0.64–1.01) .0615 0.99 (0.82–1.18) .8713
 Post-ED session 0.86 (0.68–1.09) .2041 0.89 (0.74–1.08) .2367
 Computer BI * post-ED session 1.16 (0.84–1.62) .3670 1.17 (0.90–1.52) .2441
 Therapist BI * post-ED session 1.29 (0.93–1.80) .1327 1.04 (0.80–1.35) .7733
Alcohol consequencesb
 Computer BI 0.99 (0.85–1.17) .9410 0.73 (0.61–0.88) .0011
 Therapist BI 0.90 (0.76–1.06) .2044 0.86 (0.72–1.02) .0792
 Post-ED session 0.84 (0.71–0.99) .0409 0.88 (0.74–1.05) .1665
 Computer BI × post-ED session 1.09 (0.86–1.39) .4871 1.38 (1.06–1.79) .0167
 Therapist BI × post-ED session 1.33 (1.05–1.68) .0199 1.02 (0.79–1.33) .8594

The reference group is the control group. These models controlled for baseline values of the domain (ie, alcohol consumption index or alcohol consequences) and age group and gender.

a

Quantity-frequency index; higher scores indicate greater alcohol consumption.

b

The 18-item Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index assessed alcohol-related consequences.