Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 29;12:125. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0290-5

Table 3.

Main intention to treat analyses of effect of Walk Well programme on primary and secondary outcomes assessed immediately after end of programme (12 weeks)

Walk Well Control Main between group comparison
Outcomes N Mean (SD) N Mean (SD) Intervention effect (95 % CI)a p ICC
Primary outcome
Step count per day 42 4823 (2059) 40 4784 (2613) 69.5 (−1054, 1193.3) 0.90 0.51
Secondary outcomes
Percentage time per day PA 42 33.5 (10.0) 40 34.0 (12.0) - 1.5 (−6.1, 3.0) 0.5 0.22
Percentage time per day MVPA 42 3.0 (2.6) 40 3.1 (2.1) 0.3 (–0.7, 1.3) 0.55 0.42
Percentage time per day sedentary 42 66.4 (10.0) 40 65.9 (12.0) 1.6 (−3.0, 6.1) 0.49 0.22
Total MET minutes per week 37 1311.9 (1293.2) 37 1154.8 (1103.7) 56.0 (−428.8,540.9) 0.82 0.02
Body mass index 43 32.1 (7.7) 43 32.9 (7.5) −0.21 (−0.83,0.41) 0.49 0.00
Waist circumference 45 104.9 (16.9) 42 107.8 (17.8) −1.64 (−3.93,0.64) 0.15 0.00
Subjective vitality 39 14.6 (2.5) 35 14.3 (2.8) 0.33 (−0.85, 1.52) 0.57 0.00
Self-efficacy 43 14.4 (3.0) 42 13.7 (3.7) 0.77 (−0.68, 2.22) 0.29 0.08
EQ-5D 44 0.8 (0.27) 43 0.7 (0.30) 0.02 (−0.09, 0.14) 0.70 0.00

SD standard deviation, ICC Intraclass correlation coefficient, SE-AID Self Efficacy and Intellectual Disabilities, EQ-5D European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions, MET metabolic equivalents, PA physical activity of any intensity, MVPA moderate vigorous physical activity

aBetween group mixed effects model adjusted for cluster and baseline value