Table 2.
Results from Wilcoxon rank-based tests after adjustment for covariates indicating the pairwise comparisons for the genera with a statistically significant difference across the groups
| Taxa | Overall P value | Comparison | F value | P valuea | FDR P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteroidetes otherb | 0.006 | NO vs. Ab+ vs. Ab− | 2.42 | 0.094 | 0.154 |
| Ab+ vs. Ab− vs. Co | 4.82 | 0.010 | 0.029 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Co | 9.48 | 0.003 | 0.019 | ||
| Ab− vs. Co | 1.69 | 0.197 | 0.276 | ||
| NO vs. Ab− | 2.86 | 0.094 | 0.154 | ||
| NO vs. Ab+ | 0.26 | 0.614 | 0.682 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Ab− | 4.13 | 0.045 | 0.090 | ||
| Co vs. NO | 8.65 | 0.004 | 0.019 | ||
| Alistipes | 0.013 | NO vs. Ab+ vs. Ab− | 4.52 | 0.013 | 0.034 |
| Ab+ vs. Ab− vs. Co | 1.10 | 0.338 | 0.422 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Co | 1.30 | 0.256 | 0.336 | ||
| Ab− vs. Co | 0.04 | 0.848 | 0.893 | ||
| NO vs. Ab− | 9.04 | 0.003 | 0.019 | ||
| NO vs. Ab+ | 1.73 | 0.191 | 0.273 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Ab− | 2.01 | 0.159 | 0.231 | ||
| Co vs. NO | 7.02 | 0.009 | 0.028 | ||
| RC9 gut group | 0.024 | NO vs. Ab+ vs. Ab− | 3.93 | 0.023 | 0.053 |
| Ab+ vs. Ab− vs. Co | 4.91 | 0.009 | 0.028 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Co | 7.52 | 0.007 | 0.025 | ||
| Ab− vs. Co | 0.03 | 0.864 | 0.893 | ||
| NO vs. Ab− | 0.89 | 0.348 | 0.422 | ||
| NO vs. Ab+ | 3.77 | 0.055 | 0.107 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Ab− | 7.72 | 0.006 | 0.024 | ||
| Co vs. NO | 1.15 | 0.287 | 0.369 | ||
| Prevotellaceae | 0.006 | NO vs. Ab+ vs. Ab− | 5.06 | 0.008 | 0.026 |
| Ab+ vs. Ab− vs. Co | 5.53 | 0.005 | 0.022 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Co | 7.59 | 0.007 | 0.025 | ||
| Ab− vs. Co | 0.01 | 0.912 | 0.912 | ||
| NO vs. Ab− | 4.61 | 0.034 | 0.070 | ||
| NO vs. Ab+ | 1.30 | 0.257 | 0.336 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Ab− | 9.44 | 0.003 | 0.019 | ||
| Co vs. NO | 3.69 | 0.058 | 0.108 | ||
| Catenibacterium | 0.015 | NO vs. Ab+ vs. Ab− | 5.37 | 0.006 | 0.024 |
| Ab+ vs. Ab− vs. Co | 5.13 | 0.007 | 0.025 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Co | 2.59 | 0.111 | 0.172 | ||
| Ab− vs. Co | 2.22 | 0.139 | 0.209 | ||
| NO vs. Ab− | 0.71 | 0.402 | 0.469 | ||
| NO vs. Ab+ | 6.03 | 0.016 | 0.039 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Ab− | 10.23 | 0.002 | 0.017 | ||
| Co vs. NO | 0.55 | 0.462 | 0.533 | ||
| Lactobacillus | <0.001 | NO vs. Ab+ vs. Ab− | 2.32 | 0.104 | 0.164 |
| Ab+ vs. Ab− vs. CO | 8.82 | <0.001 | 0.008 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Co | 8.42 | 0.005 | 0.020 | ||
| Ab− vs. Co | 16.94 | <0.001 | 0.004 | ||
| NO vs. Ab− | 4.63 | 0.034 | 0.070 | ||
| NO vs. Ab+ | 1.04 | 0.310 | 0.393 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Ab− | 0.87 | 0.352 | 0.422 | ||
| Co vs. NO | 4.87 | 0.030 | 0.066 | ||
| Staphylococcus | 0.001 | NO vs. Ab+ vs. Ab− | 1.88 | 0.158 | 0.231 |
| Ab+ vs. Ab− vs. Co | 8.52 | <0.001 | 0.008 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Co | 6.79 | 0.011 | 0.029 | ||
| Ab− vs. Co | 16.79 | <0.001 | 0.004 | ||
| NO vs. Ab− | 3.59 | 0.061 | 0.109 | ||
| NO vs. Ab+ | 0.23 | 0.630 | 0.691 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Ab− | 1.53 | 0.219 | 0.294 | ||
| Co vs. NO | 5.91 | 0.017 | 0.041 | ||
| Succiniclasticum | 0.001 | NO vs. Ab+ vs. Ab− | 6.58 | 0.002 | 0.017 |
| Ab+ vs. Ab− vs. Co | 0.20 | 0.818 | 0.877 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Co | 0.35 | 0.556 | 0.634 | ||
| Ab− vs. Co | 0.01 | 0.907 | 0.912 | ||
| NO vs. Ab− | 11.73 | <0.001 | 0.011 | ||
| NO vs. Ab+ | 6.77 | 0.011 | 0.029 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Ab− | 0.27 | 0.605 | 0.681 | ||
| Co vs. NO | 11.33 | 0.001 | 0.012 | ||
| Thalassospira | 0.008 | NO vs. Ab+ vs. Ab− | 1.61 | 0.204 | 0.283 |
| Ab+ vs. Ab− vs. Co | 4.73 | 0.011 | 0.029 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Co | 1.54 | 0.217 | 0.294 | ||
| Ab− vs. Co | 9.26 | 0.003 | 0.019 | ||
| NO vs. Ab− | 0.03 | 0.873 | 0.893 | ||
| NO vs. Ab+ | 2.34 | 0.129 | 0.197 | ||
| Ab+ vs. Ab− | 2.76 | 0.100 | 0.160 | ||
| Co vs. NO | 8.92 | 0.004 | 0.019 |
Ab−, seronegative; Ab+, seropositive; CO, unrelated control; FDR, false discovery rate; NO, new onset.
aSignificant differences are in bold font.
bA group of bacteria that belong to the Bacteroidetes phylum and could not be classified to lower taxa levels.