Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 29;15:104. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0100-7

Table 2.

Cost savings and utility gains of the test strategy compared with the usual care strategy for different adherence assumptions for 1000 patients

Adherence rate, % Cost saving (loss), $ QALYs gained
1 (72,332) 0.7
2 (55,331) 1.1
3 (38,330) 1.5
4 (21,329) 2.0
5 (4,328) 2.4
7.5 38,175 3.5
10 80,678 4.5
15 165,683 6.7
20 250,689 8.8
25 335,694 11.0
30 420,699 13.1
40 590,710 17.5
50 760,721 21.8