Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 29;14:374. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0865-2

Table 1.

Associations between measures of urbanicity and the household density of mosquitoes stratified by study site

Urbanicity metric Exposure categories Walukuba Kihihi Nagongera
HDM (nights of collection)a IRRb (95 % CI) P HDM (nights of collection)a IRRb (95 % CI) P HDM (nights of collection)a IRRb (95 % CI) P
Household densityc ≤80 2.08 (327) 0.30 (0.16–0.59) <0.001 4.68 (2086) 0.68 (0.28–1.64) 0.39 43.3 (2329) N/A
>80 0.90 (1857) 3.58 (166) None
NDVId >0.45 1.85 (707) 0.35 (0.21–0.57) <0.001 4.78 (1704) 0.83 (0.48–1.42) 0.49 41.1 (1660) 1.16 (0.87–1.54) 0.32
≤0.45 0.71 (1477) 4.04 (548) 48.7 (669)
Night-time lights ≤3 1.33 (1526) 0.32 (0.19–0.55) <0.001 4.60 (2252) N/A 43.3 (2329) N/A
>3 0.49 (658) None None
Land cover ≤20 % 1.37 (1265) 0.42 (0.26–0.69) 0.001 Not measured Not measured
>20 % 0.68 (919)
Composite scoree Low 1.37 (1501) 0.28 (0.17–0.48) <0.001 4.68 (2086) 0.68 (0.28–1.64) 0.39 43.3 (2329) N/A
High 0.44 (683) 3.58 (166) None

aHousehold density of mosquitoes (number of adult female anophelines caught per nights of collection)

bIncidence rate ratio

cNumber of households within 100 m radius from participating household

dNormalized difference vegetation index

e1 point for each individual urbanicity metric: Walukuba (low = 0–2, high = 3–4), Kihihi and Nagongera (low = 0–1, high = 2)