Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 29;10(9):e0138413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138413

Table 2. Association between quality of sputum sample and patient characteristics, according to intervention (exposure to sputum submission instruction video, n = 100) or control group (standard care, n = 100).

Characteristic No. Positive sputum microscopy 1 , n (%) Sputum volume ≥3 mL 1 , n (%) High-quality sputum 1 , n (%)
Intervention Control Intervention Control P value Intervention Control P value Intervention Control P value
Age group, years 0.037 0.55 0.093
    18–37 53 46 23 (43.4) 16 (34.8) 33 (62.3) 22 (47.8) 35 (66) 33 (71.7)
    >37 47 54 33 (70.2) 7 (13) 45 (97.8) 19 (35.2) 42 (85.7) 26 (48.1)
Sex 0.22 0.93 0.77
    Male 54 52 35 (64.8) 12 (23.1) 43 (79.6) 25 (48.1) 47 (87) 30 (57.7)
    Female 46 48 21 (45.7) 11 (22.9) 35 (76.1) 19 (39.6) 39 (84.8) 29 (60.4)
HIV status 0.98 0.50 0.56
    Positive 30 19 14 (46.7) 3 (15.8) 21 (70) 8 (42.1) 23 (76.7) 6 (31.6)
    Negative / unknown 70 81 42 (60) 20 (24.7) 27 (38.6) 30 (37) 41 (58.6) 23 (28.4)
Level of education 0.99 0.98 0.99
    Basic/higher education 93 97 48 (51.6) 20 (20.6) 49 (52.7) 28 (28.9) 57 (61.3) 35 (36.1)
    No formal education 7 3 6 (85.7) 0 (0) 6 (85.7) 0 (0) 6 (85.7) 0 (0)
Employment status 0.97 0.29 0.749
    Employed 77 75 44 (57.1) 18 (24) 28(36.4) 30 (40) 67 (87) 42 (56)
    Unemployed 23 25 12 (52.2) 5 (20) 8 (34.8 11 (44) 17 (74) 13 (52)

1 see definitions in the Methods section.

P values correspond to interaction terms derived from logistic regression models.