Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 28;47:75. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0152-2

Table 2.

Rank correlations between observed and predicted phenotypes (±SE) and approximate accuracies for lines W1 and WB

Model Time-dependent Rank correlation Approximate accuracy
W1 % Improvementa WB % Improvementa W1 WB
STM 0.135 ± 0.012 0.170 ± 0.012 0.44 0.46
RMM.t No 0.148 ± 0.012 +10 0.185 ± 0.012 +9 0.48 0.51
RMM.p No 0.162 ± 0.012 +20 0.174 ± 0.012 +2 0.53 0.47
GLMM No 0.150 ± 0.012 +11 0.190 ± 0.012 +12 0.49 0.52
RMM.t Yes 0.063 ± 0.013 −53 0.134 ± 0.012 −21 0.20 0.37
RMM.p Yes 0.049 ± 0.013 −64 0.124 ± 0.012 −27 0.16 0.34
GLMM Yes 0.081 ± 0.013 −41 0.149 ± 0.012 −12 0.26 0.41

Rank correlations between observed and predicted phenotypes and approximate accuracies using STM, RMM.t, RMM.p, and GLMM are provided for lines W1 and WB. All models were analysed by either excluding (time-dependent = no) or including (time-dependent = yes) timing of IGE expression

aCompared to STM