Table 3.

Pharmacist evaluation of training

Feedback questions (n = 17 pharmacists)	Scale			Median score
To what extent did the training MANUAL meet your expectations?	Very well	1 2 3 4 5 6 7	Very poorly	1 (1 – 2)
To what extent did the training WORKSHOP meet your expectations?	Very well	1 2 3 4 5 6 7	Very poorly	1 (1 – 2)
How would you rate the training MANUAL on the relevance of the content to your practice?	Relevant	1 2 3 4 5 6 7	Irrelevant	1 (1 – 1)
How would you rate the training WORKSHOP on the relevance of the content to your practice?	Relevant	1 2 3 4 5 6 7	Irrelevant	1 (1 – 2)
How would you rate the formata of information provided in the training MANUAL?	Excellent	1 2 3 4 5 6 7	Poor	1 (1 – 3)
How would you rate the amount of information provided in the training MANUAL?	Too little	1 2 3 4 5 6 7	Too much	5 (2 – 5)
How would you rate the amount of information provided in the training WORKSHOP?	Too little	1 2 3 4 5 6 7	Too much	5 (4 – 6)
How would you rate the quality of the training WORKSHOP, specifically the following activities:
• Lectures	Excellent	1 2 3 4 5 6 7	Poor	1 (1 – 2)
• Technical skills (e.g., blood pressure measurement)	Excellent	1 2 3 4 5 6 7	Poor	1 (1 – 2)
• Case studies	Excellent	1 2 3 4 5 6 7	Poor	1 (1 – 3)
How would you rate the duration of training WORKSHOP?	Too short	1 2 3 4 5 6 7	Too long	5 (5 – 7)
How would you rate your confidence in applying this training into your practice?	Extremely confident	1 2 3 4 5 6 7	Not at all confident	2 (1 – 6)
What factors enhanced your learning?
What would help you improve your skills?
What would help you improve your knowledge?
What would help you improve your ability to apply these skills in the workplace?
Other comments and suggestions to improve the training?

^a“format” refers to structure, organization, and presentation of content