Table 1.
Each participant contributed one quantile value, following the procedure from Ulrich et al. (2007).
Experiment | Quantile (%) | VO–Miller bound | VO–Grice bound | VO–UCIP | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Δ (ms) | t | p | Δ (ms) | t | p | Δ (ms) | t | p | ||
1 | 5 | −20 | −1.68 | 0.144 | −20 | −1.68 | 0.145 | −20 | −1.68 | 0.144 |
15 | −11 | −1.15 | 0.295 | −13 | −1.52 | 0.180 | −11 | −1.18 | 0.281 | |
25 | 0 | 0.04 | 0.971 | −13 | −1.99 | 0.094 | −2 | −0.27 | 0.800 | |
35 | 8 | 0.82 | 0.443 | −8 | −1.43 | 0.204 | 5 | 0.58 | 0.583 | |
45 | 22 | 1.30 | 0.242 | −4 | −0.36 | 0.732 | 14 | 0.92 | 0.391 | |
55 | 45 | 2.30 | 0.061 | 2 | 0.11 | 0.915 | 33 | 1.85 | 0.114 | |
65 | 74 | 2.65 | 0.038 | −6 | −0.21 | 0.844 | 43 | 1.79 | 0.123 | |
75 | 111 | 4.26 | 0.005 | −33 | −1.05 | 0.333 | 50 | 2.62 | 0.039 | |
85 | 203 | 4.11 | 0.006 | −118 | −1.84 | 0.116 | 73 | 1.77 | 0.128 | |
95 | 337 | 4.41 | 0.004 | −72 | −0.91 | 0.400 | 74 | 0.94 | 0.384 | |
2 | 5 | 13 | 0.77 | 0.472 | 11 | 0.65 | 0.543 | 13 | 0.77 | 0.473 |
15 | 14 | 0.92 | 0.395 | 4 | 0.24 | 0.822 | 13 | 0.86 | 0.422 | |
25 | 29 | 2.01 | 0.091 | 9 | 0.52 | 0.622 | 26 | 1.71 | 0.138 | |
35 | 39 | 2.20 | 0.070 | −13 | −1.26 | 0.255 | 33 | 1.99 | 0.093 | |
45 | 46 | 3.98 | 0.007 | −46 | −3.05 | 0.022 | 31 | 3.49 | 0.013 | |
55 | 60 | 4.08 | 0.007 | −69 | −2.54 | 0.044 | 31 | 3.01 | 0.024 | |
65 | 77 | 5.08 | 0.002 | −83 | −2.92 | 0.027 | 29 | 2.92 | 0.027 | |
75 | 110 | 5.92 | 0.001 | −112 | −3.39 | 0.015 | 35 | 4.82 | *0.003 | |
85 | 179 | 6.16 | 0.001 | −120 | −2.39 | 0.054 | 64 | 3.47 | 0.013 | |
95 | 293 | 4.89 | 0.003 | −131 | −2.09 | 0.082 | 54 | 1.37 | 0.218 |
Negative t-values for the Miller and positive t-values for Grice bound comparisons indicate violations of the respective bounds. Significant model violations in bold; the asterisk marks a significant violation after Holm-Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.