TABLE 4.
Adjudication Questions | Surgeons | Radiologists | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICC | 95% CI | ICC | 95% CI | |||
Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||
Findings consistent with FAI? | 0.41 | −0.03 | 0.67 | 0.25 | −0.32 | 0.57 |
Cam lesion? | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.92 | 0.72 | 0.50 | 0.84 |
Pistol-grip abnormality? | 0.01 | −0.73 | 0.44 | 0.68 | 0.44 | 0.82 |
Alpha angle >50.5? | 0.19 | −0.43 | 0.54 | 0.42 | −0.01 | 0.67 |
Size of alpha angle? | 0.84 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.95 |
Offset ratio of <0.17? | 0.40 | −0.06 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.49 | 0.83 |
Size of offset ratio? | 0.82 | 0.68 | 0.90 | −0.04 | −0.82 | 0.41 |
Pincer lesion? | 0.70 | 0.48 | 0.83 | −0.13 | −0.98 | 0.36 |
Crossover sign abnormality? | 0.29 | −0.25 | 0.59 | 0.26 | −0.30 | 0.58 |
Posterior wall sign abnormality? | 0.20 | −0.40 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.08 | 0.70 |
Ischial spine sign abnormality? | 0.55 | 0.20 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.65 | 0.89 |
Coxa profunda abnormality? | 0.02 | −0.72 | 0.44 | 0.52 | 0.16 | 0.73 |
Acetabular protrusio abnormality? | 0.10 | −0.57 | 0.49 | −0.03 | −0.81 | 0.41 |
Mixed FAI? | 0.15 | −0.49 | 0.52 | 0.45 | 0.04 | 0.69 |
Radiographic view most helpful? | 0.00 | −0.75 | 0.43 | 0.20 | −0.40 | 0.54 |
aBoldfaced values indicate an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ≥0.61, suggesting at least good agreement. FAI, femoroacetabular impingement.