Table 1.
Comprehensive ranking of persister genes and pathways according to scores∗.
| Mutated persister genes | Persistence pathways | KEGG pathways | Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | oxyR | Antioxidant defense | 10 | |
| 2 | dnaK | Global regulator | RNA degradation | 9 |
| 3 | sucB | Energy production | Lysine degradation| Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)| Carbon metabolism | 8 |
| relA | Stringent response | Purine metabolism | 8 | |
| 4 | rpoS | Global regulator | 7 | |
| 5 | clpB | Global regulator | 6 | |
| mqsR | TA module | 6 | ||
| recA | SOS response | Homologous recombination | 6 | |
| 6 | lon | TA module/protease | 5 | |
| 7 | phoU | Global regulator | 4 | |
| smpB | Trans-translation | 4 | ||
| glpD | Energy production | Glycerophospholipid metabolism | 4 | |
| relE | TA module | 4 | ||
| 8 | ssrA | Trans-translation | 3 | |
| uvrA | SOS response | Nucleotide excision repair | 3 | |
| tisAB | TA module | 3 | ||
| 9 | tnaA | Signaling pathway | Tryptophan metabolism | 1 |
| umuD | SOS response | 1 | ||
| hipA | TA module | 1 | ||
| 10 | pspF | Signaling pathway | 0 | |
| dinJ | TA module | 0 |
∗Persister genes were ranked according to cell survival under exposure to four different antibiotics at different times. The persisters genes whose mutants show significant difference compared to the parent strain were scored as “1” point, whereas those mutants that did show significant difference were scored as “0”. All scores for a given mutant are calculated from the sum of different antibiotic exposures to obtain the ranking order of the 21 persister genes.