Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 9;102(4):943–950. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.112185

TABLE 2.

Associations between serum folate and vitamin B-12 concentrations and clinical outcomes after assisted reproduction in 100 women (154 initiated cycles) from the Environment and Reproductive Health Study (2007–2013)1

Implantation
Clinical pregnancy
Live birth
Quartile (minimum–maximum) Cases/cycles, % RR (95% CI) Cases/cycles, % RR (95% CI) Cases/cycles, % RR (95% CI)
Serum folate, ng/mL
 Q1 (9.7–16.5) 22/45 (48.9) 1.00 (ref) 18/45 (40.0) 1.00 (ref) 14/45 (31.1) 1.00 (ref)
 Q2 (16.6–20.2) 20/35 (57.1) 1.23 (0.85, 1.77) 15/35 (42.9) 1.02 (0.62, 1.67) 10/35 (28.6) 0.77 (0.38, 1.54)
 Q3 (20.3–26.3) 23/39 (58.9) 1.23 (0.90. 1.69) 22/39 (56.4) 1.35 (0.90, 2.02) 17/39 (43.6) 1.19 (0.68, 2.09)
 Q4 (26.4–154.2) 22/35 (62.9) 1.31 (0.89, 1.93) 21/35 (60.0) 1.50 (0.98, 2.32) 18/35 (51.4) 1.62 (0.99, 2.65)
 P-trend 0.26 0.04 0.01
Serum vitamin B-12, pg/mL
 Q1 (162–438) 25/43 (58.1) 1.00 (ref) 20/43 (46.5) 1.00 (ref) 12/43 (27.9) 1.00 (ref)
 Q2 (439–534) 23/46 (50.0) 0.89 (0.62, 1.28) 20/46 (43.5) 0.92 (0.61, 1.39) 16/46 (34.8) 1.19 (0.67, 2.10)
 Q3 (535–701) 15/32 (46.9) 0.82 (0.53, 1.27) 14/32 (43.8) 0.91 (0.57, 1.46) 11/32 (34.4) 1.13 (0.57, 2.24)
 Q4 (702–2176) 24/33 (72.7) 1.31 (0.95, 1.80) 22/33 (66.7) 1.43 (0.98, 2.08) 20/33 (60.6) 2.04 (1.14, 3.62)
 P-trend 0.03 0.01 0.008
1

All analyses were conducted by using generalized estimating equations with binomial distribution and log link function with adjustment for age (continuous), BMI (continuous), and race (white, other). Tests for trend across quartiles were conducted by using a variable with the median serum concentration in each quartile as a continuous variable. Q, quartile; ref, reference.