Table 1.
According to tertiles of android fat massa |
According to tertiles of android:gynoid fat ratioa |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tertile 1 (n = 33) | Tertile 2 (n = 34) | Tertile 3 (n = 34) | p for trend | Tertile 1 (n = 33) | Tertile 2 (n = 34) | Tertile 3 (n = 34) | p for trend | |
Women, no. (%) | 26 (79) | 19 (56) | 20 (59) | 0.09 | 31 (94) | 28 (82) | 6 (18) | <.001 |
White, no. (%) | 22 (67) | 23 (68) | 24 (71) | 0.73 | 24 (73) | 20 (59) | 25 (74) | 0.93 |
Education, mean years (SD) | 13.6 (3.1) | 13.4 (3.7) | 12.2 (2.4) | 0.08 | 12.7 (2.4) | 14 (3.5) | 12.5 (3.3) | 0.84 |
Current smoker, no. (%) | 12 (36) | 10 (29) | 14 (41) | 0.68 | 13 (39) | 12 (35) | 11 (32) | 0.55 |
Ever smoker, no. (%) | 18 (54) | 18 (53) | 24 (71) | 0.18 | 20 (61) | 19 (56) | 21 (62) | 0.91 |
BMI, mean kg/m2 (SD) | 24.3 (2.8) | 31.2 (4.9) | 37.4 (5.1) | <.001 | 28.6 (6.6) | 32.1 (8.2) | 32.4 (5.1) | 0.03 |
According to tertiles of trunk:limb fat ratioa |
According to categorized BMI (kg/m2) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tertile 1 (n = 33) | Tertile 2 (n = 34) | Tertile 3 (n = 34) | p for trend | 18.5 - < 25 (n = 24) | 25 - < 30 (n = 25) | ≥30 (n = 57) | p for trend | |
Women, no. (%) | 31 (94) | 26 (76) | 8 (24) | <.001 | 20 (83) | 15 (60) | 33 (58) | 0.04 |
White, no. (%) | 20 (61) | 24 (71) | 25 (74) | 0.26 | 16 (67) | 18 (72) | 38 (67) | 0.92 |
Education, mean years (SD) | 13.3 (2.9) | 13.6 (3.2) | 12.3 (3.3) | 0.20 | 14.5 (3.3) | 13.2 (2.4) | 12.7 (3.4) | 0.18 |
Current smoker, no. (%) | 10 (30) | 14 (41) | 12 (35) | 0.68 | 9 (38) | 9 (36) | 18 (32) | 0.58 |
Ever smoker, no. (%) | 16 (49) | 21 (62) | 23 (68) | 0.11 | 13 (54) | 13 (52) | 35 (61) | 0.47 |
BMI, mean kg/m2 (SD) | 30.9 (9.1) | 29.5 (5.5) | 32.9 (5.2) | 0.23 | 22.9 (1.5) | 27.6 (1.6) | 36.6 (5.3) | <.001 |
aTertiles for android fat mass, android:gynoid fat ratio, and trunk:limb ratio add up to 101, as only 101 of the 106 participants had DXA scan measures available.