Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 30;15:435. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1095-6

Table 2.

Comparison between participants and population data of condition severity by health condition

AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER
Questionnaire Participants Australian source
Young person SDQ n Mean SD n Mean SD p value1
  Total score 116 17.6 6.1 29 18.4 5.6 0.47
  Emotional symptoms 116 4.8 2.5 29 4.5 3.0 0.68
  Conduct problems 116 3.0 2.2 29 2.8 1.7 0.47
  Hyperactivity 116 5.5 2.4 29 5.9 2.0 0.39
  Peer Problems 116 4.2 2.2 29 5.2 2.7 0.07
  Prosocial 116 6.5 2.1 29 7.0 2.0 0.23
Participants SNAP source
Parent-reported SDQ n Mean SD n Mean SD p value1
  Total score 113 22.8 5.9 105 13.5 7.2 <0.001
  Emotional symptoms 113 6.3 2.4 105 2.9 2.4 <0.001
  Conduct problems 113 3.6 2.5 104 1.7 1.6 <0.001
  Hyperactivity 113 6.7 2.5 105 4.8 2.8 <0.001
  Peer Problems 113 6.2 2.2 105 4.1 3.1 <0.001
  Prosocial 113 5.1 2.3 104 6.0 2.4 0.01
Participants SNAP source
SRS n Mean SD n Mean SD p value1
  Total score 114 117.2 29.7 71 90.3 27.3 <0.001
CEREBRAL PALSY
Questionnaire Participantsa Regional samples: NECCPS & NICPRb
GMFCS at age 5 years n (%) n (%) p value2
  I 25 (26) 95 (26)
  II 42 (44) 159 (44)
  III 16 (17) 59 (16)
  IV 11 (11) 41 (11)
  V 2 (2) 8 (2)
  Total 96 (100) 362 (100) 0.99
DIABETES
Indicator Participants UK national datac p value3
n Mean SD n Mean SD
  HbA1c (mmol/mol) 150 72.5 18.6 11676 71.6 22.6 0.56
  Age at diagnosis (years) 150 9.5 3.8 11676 9.0 3.8 0.10

1Two sample t-test of difference in means between participants and population data

SD Standard Deviation

SDQ Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire

SRS Social Responsiveness Scale

SNAP Special Needs and Autism Project

aData missing from one site

bThose born in region, 1995–98, IQ > 50

2Chi-squared test of difference in GMFCS distribution between participants and population data

GMFCS Gross Motor Function Classification System

NECCPR North of England Collaborative Cerebral Palsy Survey

NICPR Northern Ireland Cerebral Palsy Register

cData from UK National Paediatric Diabetes Audit, children aged 14–18 years [39]

3Two sample t-test of difference in means between participants and comparators