Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 30.

Published in final edited form as: Qual Life Res. 2014 Jan 31;24(1):135–146. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0629-4

Fig. 2 — Histograms showing the distributions of model-based posterior probabilities of being assigned to the classes first for the U.S. sample (N=117; From Snyder, Garrett-Mayer, Blackford et al., 2009)[5], followed by the Canadian sample (N=189) and Japanese sample (N=407). Each value represents the probability that a particular individual is in that particular class, given his or her pattern of responses to the QLQ-C30 and SCNS items. Values close to 0 and 1 represent good classification, while values near 0.50 represent class assignment based on chance. Class size is presented as the proportion of the sample (out of 100).

Fig. 2 — Histograms showing the distributions of model-based posterior probabilities of being assigned to the classes first for the U.S. sample (N=117; From Snyder, Garrett-Mayer, Blackford et al., 2009)[5], followed by the Canadian sample (N=189) and Japanese sample (N=407). Each value represents the probability that a particular individual is in that particular class, given his or her pattern of responses to the QLQ-C30 and SCNS items. Values close to 0 and 1 represent good classification, while values near 0.50 represent class assignment based on chance. Class size is presented as the proportion of the sample (out of 100).