Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0138341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138341

Table 4. Univariate and multivariate analysis for OS and PFS .

OS PFS
UNIVARIATE MULTIVARIATE UNIVARIATE MULTIVARIATE
Variable Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value
mResponse Class I (vs II,III,IV) 0.58 (0.36 to 0.92) 0.02 0.56 (0.35 to 0.89) 0.01 0.34 (0.21 to 0.56) <0.001 0.29 (0.17 to 0.49) <0.001
ECOG PS 1 (vs 0) 1.18 (0.74 to 1.88) 0.49 1.21 (0.77 to 1.92) 0.41
Number of previous chemotherapy lines (1 to 6) 0.89 (0.73 to 1.10) 0.28 0.88 (0.69 to 1.11) 0.27
Previous treatment with bevacizumab (vs no) 1.69 (1.05 to 2.72) 0.03 1.80 (1.10 to 2.92) 0.02 1.86 (1.16 to 2.98) 0.01 1.80 (1.12 to 2.91) 0.02
KRAS mutation (vs WT) 0.72 (0.45 to 1.13) 0.16 1.01 (0.65 to 1.58) 0.95
BMI ≥25 (vs <25) 0.55 (0.34 to 0.87) 0.01 0.50 (0.31 to 0.81) 0.004 0.72 (0.46 to 1.14) 0.16
Age 0.98 (0.96 to 1.01) 0.15 0.98 (0.96 to 1.01) 0.15
Male (vs female) 0.68 (0.43 to 1.07) 0.09 0.62 (0.39 to 0.98) 0.04 0.53 (0.33 to 0.87) 0.01
Occurrence HFSR before 2 nd FDG PET-CT(vs no) 0.54 (0.33to 0.89) 0.02 0.49 (0.30 to 0.81) 0.005 0.87 (0.55 to 1.38) 0.54
Occurrence HSFR * (vs no) 0.59 (0.37 to 0.95) 0.03 0.81 (0.51 to 1.27) 0.35

* Time dependent variable;

from date second FDG PET-CT