Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 25;36(37):2500–2507. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv292

Table 3.

Primary analysis—shock efficacy (per protocol episode data set)

Total Without DF test With DF test
All patients with at least one delivered appropriate shock for a true VT/VF episode, n/total n (%) 91/1046 (8.7) 46/523 (8.8) 45/523 (8.6)
All true VT/VF episodes with at least one delivered appropriate ICD shock (VT/VF), n 429 218 211
Delivered appropriate shocks per true VT/VF episode (mean (±SD)) 1.18 (±0.69) 1.09 (±0.37) 1.28 (±0.90)
True VT/VF episodes terminated with first appropriate ICD shock, n/total n (%) 384/429 (89.5) 204/218 (93.6) 180/211 (85.3)
True VT/VF episodes terminated with any appropriate ICD shock, n/total n (%) 422/429 (98.4) 218/218 (100.0) 204/211 (96.7)
True VT/VF episodes not terminated with any appropriate ICD shock, n/total n (%) 7/429 (1.6) 0/218 (0.0) 7/211 (3.3)
Conversion efficacy [proportion (95% CI)] 0.98 (0.97;0.99) 1.00 (0.98;1.00) 0.97 (0.93;0.99)
First shock efficacy model based [proportion (95% CI)] 0.96 (0.89;0.98) 0.97 (0.91;0.99) 0.94 (0.83;0.98))

Difference between the groups (without DF testing vs. with DF testing): 0.03 (−0.03;0.09).

DF, defibrillation; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; P-PPS, per protocol episode data set; VT/VF, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation.