Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 1;5:14676. doi: 10.1038/srep14676

Figure 6. Mel’s protective effects on the cognitive deficits and anxiety induced by DINP exposure.

Figure 6

(A) The escape latency for the 7 days training. (B) The average escape latency for 7 days training. (C) The swimming time in the target quadrant on the 14th day. (D) The number of target quadrant entries on the 14th day. (E) The proportion of distance traveled in central/total area. (F) The proportion of entry times into central/total area. (G) The defecation number. Repeated-measures ANOVA followed by a Tukey test was used in the analysis of MWM escape latencies. A one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey test was used to analyze all other data. #P < 0.05; ##P < 0.01, compared with the 200 mg/kg/day DINP. In MWM, the number of mice in 200 mg/kg/day group was 6, other groups was 7. In OFT, the number of mice in all groups was 7.