Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 1;5:14699. doi: 10.1038/srep14699

Figure 6. Comparison of the performance of MeSiC with MEDIPS and methylCRF.

Figure 6

(A) Correlation analysis of MeSiC predictions and MEDIPS-normalized ams relative to 5 mC levels at different genomic elements on 24 chromosomes of the H1 cell line. Correlation analysis of MeSiC predictions and MEDIPS-normalized ams relative to BS-seq values at different genomic elements on 24 chromosomes of (B) BGMs and (C) NCCs. The ams which corrects for the CpG density of the element was calculated through dividing mean rms by mean coupling factors of bins that located in the element. (D) Concordance and (E) correlation analysis of the predictions of MeSiC and methylCRF relative to 5 mC levels at different genomic elements on 24 chromosomes of the H1 cell line. Solid and dash lines represent MeSiC and methylCRF, respectively. Different colors represent different genomic elements.