Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 1;8:15. doi: 10.1186/s13044-015-0027-1

Table 4.

Summary of primary and sensitivity analyses

Outcome Primary analysis Sensitivity analyses
Excluding ‘lower’ quality studies [8, 1215] a Excluding imputed data [10] b Excluding studies that did not use electrocautery in conventional [8, 1518] c
Operating Time (min) −29.13 (−36.73, −21.53) −22.72 (−31.75, −13.68) −30.34 (−38.13, −22.54) −28.95 (−38.44, −19.35)
(MD [95 %CI])
Intraoperative Blood Loss (mL) −45.54 (−72.20, −18.89) −42.48 (−67.97, −16.99) Identical to primary analysis −42.48 (−67.97, −16.99)
(MD [95 %CI])
Post-Operative Pain (VAS) −1.33 (−1.99, −0.67) −1.33 (−1.99, −0.67) −1.33 (−1.99, −0.67)
(MD [95 %CI])
Length of Stay (days) −0.68 (−1.16, −0.20) −0.71 (−1.24, −0.18) −0.59 (−1.21, 0.02)
(MD [95 %CI])
Drainage Volume (mL) −29.38 (−52.46, −6.30) −29.38 (−52.46, −6.30) −29.38 (−52.46, −6.30)
(MD [95 %CI])
Hemorrhage require surgery 0.68 (0.19, 2.46) 0.78 (0.19, 3.18) 0.32 (0.05, 2.01)
(RR [95 %CI])
Transient Hypocalcemia 0.60 (0.44, 0.82) 0.67 (0.45, 1.00) 0.54 (0.37, 0.78)
(RR [95 %CI])
Persistent Hypocalcemia 0.35 (0.07, 1.91) 0.90 (0.06, 14.25) Too few studies to inform (<2)
(RR [95 %CI])
Transient RLN Paresis 0.64 (0.28, 1.44) 0.57 (0.23, 1.43) 0.43 (0.16, 1.14)
(RR [95 %CI])
Persistent RLN Paresis 0.33 (0.01, 8.03) 0.33 (0.01, 8.03) Too few studies to inform (<2)
(RR [95 %CI])
Wound Seroma 0.57 (0.12, 2.65) 0.57 (0.12, 2.65) Too few studies to inform (<2)
(RR [95 %CI])

CI Confidence Interval, LOS Length of Stay, MD Mean Difference, RR Relative Risk, VAS Visual Analog Scale, min minutes, mL milliliters

aLower quality study defined as: ≥ 4 “unclear” OR one “No” listed in any risk of bias assessment category: Cannizzaro [12], Pons [8], Sista [13], Duan [14], Soroush [15]

bMiccoli [10]

cDi Renzo [14], Docimo [16], Materazzi [17], Pons [8], Soroush [15]