Table 4.
Procedure | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Vertical banded gastroplasty | (i) No intestinal anastomosis | (i) Foreign body |
(ii) No malabsorption | (ii) High long-term failure rate | |
| ||
Adjustable gastric banding | (i) Technically simple | (i) Foreign body |
(ii) Low morbidity | (ii) 15–30% failure rate | |
(iii) Reversible | (iii) May promote maladaptive eating behaviour | |
(iv) No intestinal anastomosis | ||
(v) No malabsorption | ||
| ||
Sleeve gastrectomy | (i) Technically simple | (i) May require second-stage procedure |
(ii) Low morbidity | (ii) Unknown long-term results | |
| ||
Gastric bypass | (i) Sustained weight loss | (i) Intestinal anastamoses |
(ii) Dumping in sweet eaters | (ii) Loss of access to gastric remnant | |
(iii) Resolution of gastroesophageal reflux disease |
(iii) Mild risk for vitamin deficiencies | |
(iv) Risk of marginal ulceration | ||
| ||
Biliopancreatic diversion-duodenal switch | (i) Excellent sustained weight loss | (i) Technically demanding |
(ii) Larger portion size | (ii) Frequent bowel movement and flatulence | |
(iii) Excellent malabsorption | (iii) Increased risk of vitamin and protein malnutrition |