Table 5.

Literature Comprising Meta-Analysis for Perceptual Processor Cycle Time Parameter Estimation

Study	n	Mean age	Ages sampled	Perceptual processor cycle time (ms)	SE (ms)
Dennis, Scialfa, & Ho (2004)	12	65	60–70	179	27
Fisk, et al., (1995)	104	72	65–81	175	30
Glass et al. (2000)	10	65	60–70	205	35
Ho & Scialfa (2002)	10	66	60–72	182	40
Johnson, Reeder, Raye, & Mitchell (2002)	27	74	67–84	185	22
Madden, et. al., (2005)	24	67	62–82	157	29
Marshall, et al., (1983)	53	70	60–82	183	32
McFarland, Warren, & Karis (1958)	20	70	65–75	176	14
Nielsen-Bohlman & Knight (1999)	10	71	65–76	192	26
Picton, et al., (1984)	36	70	65–79	167	25
Picton, et al., (1986)	10	69	65–75	180	18
Podlesny & Dustman (1982)	16	71	65–75	180	30
Salthouse & Meinz (1995)	85	70	60–79	184	34
Sliwinski, et al., (1994)	51	77	69–85	176	20
Sliwinski (1997)	73	66	51–86	185	30
Tremblay, Piskosz, & Souza (2002)	10	68	61–79	180	22
Verhaeghen (2002)	35	71	66–77	175	28
Verhaeghen, Vandenbroucke, & Dierckx (1998)	13	64	59–69	150	17
Zheng, Myerson, & Hale (2000)	40	71	65–77	171	29
Weighted mean parameter estimate	639	69	51–86	178	161–195*

Note. n = number of participants in age range of interest per study.

^*Values represent plus or minus two standard deviations of means.