Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012 Nov 26;52(2):147–155. doi: 10.1177/0009922812465944

TABLE 1.

Sample Characteristics (N = 500)

Parent Demographics SD Range
 Gender (Female), % 73.0
 Race, %
  Black 60.0
  White 40.0
 Age, y 37.9 11.2 18 – 99
 Marital Status, %
  Married 56.8
  Married previously 15.2
  Never married 27.0
 Education, %
  < high school 12.8
  High school 22.4
  Some college 24.6
  College graduate 22.8
  Graduate degree 17.4
 Household income perceived to be…, %
  More than we need 8.8
  Just enough 42.6
  Not enough 48.0
Parent Religious Characteristics
 Religion, %
  Catholic 40.0
  Christian/non-Catholic 46.2
  Other religion 7.6
  (Missing) 6.2
 Religious service attendance, %
  Never 11.0
  1x/month or less 36.6
  1x/week 35.6
  More than 1x/week 15.0
 Importance religious or spiritual beliefs in daily life, %
  Very importanta 69.8
  Somewhat important or less so 28.6
Parent Risk Factors
Parents’ level of agreement with this statement: “Non-physical types of discipline (such as time out or positive reinforcement) never work as well as physical discipline such as spanking,” %
  Strongly disagree 33.0
  Disagree 50.0
  Other (agree or neither) 16.0
Parenting stress 2.2 0.7 1 – 4.7
Knowledge of child development 71.7 17.3 0 – 100
Aggression in family of origin, cumulative score 2.1 1.5 0 – 4
Index Child Demographics
Gender (Female), % 46.0
Age, y 7.0 4.8 0 – 17

Note: Total percentages for each variable do not always equal 100% due to missing values. Missings were not greater than 2% for any one variable except for religion, which was 6.2% as indicated.

a

The other 4 response categories were collapsed into “Somewhat important or less so” due to the distribution of the variable as follows: Somewhat important (20.2%), Neither important nor unimportant (1.6%), Somewhat unimportant (2.8%), and Very unimportant (4.0%).